ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2022
Retrospective comparison of liver chemical shift-encoded PDFF sampling strategies in children and adolescents.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of hepatic PDFF, T2*, and T2 estimates from breath-hold and free-breathing respiratory-gated MRI acquisitions in children and young adults.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMultiple region-of-interest (ROI) sampling strategies have been described for liver fat quantification by MRI PDFF. While adult studies have shown that sampling strategies including as few as four ROIs provide a reasonable tradeoff between laboriousness and quantitative performance, there is a paucity of similar data for pediatric patients. PURPOSE: To assess agreement between different ROI sampling strategies for liver MRI PDFF analysis in children and adolescents. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective, internal review board-approved study included clinical MRI PDFF acquisitions for 50 children and adolescents. Four different ROI sampling paradigms reported in the literature were reproduced to measure mean liver PDFF. An 18-ROI (2 in each Couinaud segment) paradigm was considered the reference standard. Spearman correlation, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and Bland-Altman analyses were used to quantify agreement.
resultsMean age for the 50 participants was 14 ± 2.5 years (range 8-17 years). Based on the 18-ROI paradigm, mean PDFF was significantly higher for the right lobe (24.0 ± 13.7% right, 22.0 ± 13.1% left; p = 0.001). PDFF values for each individual Couinaud segment were highly correlated with the reference standard (ρ = 0.977 to 0.993, p < 0.0001). PDFF values derived from all sampling paradigms, including strategies using large free-hand ROIs, were strongly correlated with the reference standard (ρ = 0.995 to 0.998, p < 0.0001) with excellent agreement (ICC range 0.995 to 0.998).
conclusionLiver PDFF sampling paradigms using large ROIs showed strong correlation, excellent agreement, and nonsignificant mean differences from a reference standard paradigm sampling every Couinaud segment in children. Paradigms that exclusively sample the right lobe may overestimate liver PDFF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.