Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35864173›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology2023

The Microbiomes in Lichen and Moss Biocrust Contribute Differently to Carbon and Nitrogen Cycles in Arid Ecosystems.

Chang Tian, Jingwen Pang, Chongfeng Bu, Shufang Wu, Hao Bai, Yahong Li, Qi Guo, Kadambot H M Siddique

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Chang Tian *Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China.
Jingwen Pang *Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China.
Chongfeng BuInstitute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China. buchongfeng@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5839-7229
Shufang WuCollege of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China.
Hao BaiSichuan Expressway Construction & Development Group Co., Ltd, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.
Yahong LiInstitute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China.
Qi GuoInstitute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China.
Kadambot H M SiddiqueThe UWA Institute of Agriculture and School of Agriculture & Environment, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, 6001, Australia.
Institute of Soil and Water Conservation · CNNorthwest A&F University · CNThe University of Western Australia · AU

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2016YFE0203400National Key Research and Development Program of China 2017YFC0504703National Natural Scientific Foundation of China 41971131
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological soil crusts (biocrusts) are distributed in arid and semiarid regions across the globe. Microorganisms are an essential component in biocrusts. They add and accelerate critical biochemical processes. However, little is known about the functional genes and metabolic processes of microbiomes in lichen and moss biocrust. This study used shotgun metagenomic sequencing to compare the microbiomes of lichen-dominated and moss-dominated biocrust and reveal the microbial genes and metabolic pathways involved in carbon and nitrogen cycling. The results showed that Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Acidobacteria were more abundant in moss biocrust than lichen biocrust, while Proteobacteria and Cyanobacteria were more abundant in lichen biocrust than moss biocrust. The relative abundance of carbohydrate-active enzymes and enzymes associated with carbon and nitrogen metabolism differed significantly between microbiomes of the two biocrust types. However, in the microbial communities of both biocrust types, respiration pathways dominated over carbon fixation pathways. The genes encoding carbon monoxide dehydrogenase were more abundant than those encoding ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCo) involved in carbon fixation. Similarly, metabolic N-pathway diversity was dominated by nitrogen reduction, followed by denitrification, with nitrogen fixation the lowest proportion. Gene diversity involved in N cycling differed between the microbiomes of the two biocrust types. Assimilatory nitrate reduction genes had higher relative abundance in lichen biocrust, whereas dissimilatory nitrate reduction genes had higher relative abundance in moss biocrust. As dissolved organic carbon and soil organic carbon are considered the main drivers of the community structure in the microbiome of biocrust, these results indicate that biocrust type has a pivotal role in microbial diversity and related biogeochemical cycling.

Indexed as

BryophytaLichensMicrobiotaCarbonEcosystemNitratesNitrogenNitrogen FixationSoilSoil MicrobiologyCarbonNitratesNitrogenSoilBiocrustCarbon cycleMetabolic pathwaysMicrobiomeNitrogen cycleShotgun metagenomic sequencing

Identifiers

PMID35864173
OpenAlexW4286433271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.