Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35864135›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

A joint learning approach for genomic prediction in polyploid grasses.

Alexandre Hild Aono, Rebecca Caroline Ulbricht Ferreira, Aline da Costa Lima Moraes, Letícia Aparecida de Castro Lara, Ricardo José Gonzaga Pimenta, Estela Araujo Costa, Luciana Rossini Pinto, Marcos Guimarães de Andrade Landell, Mateus Figueiredo Santos, Liana Jank and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Advances in genomic characterization of Urochloa humidicola: exploring polyploid inheritance and apomixis.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Alexandre Hild AonoMolecular Biology and Genetic Engineering Center (CBMEG), University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Rebecca Caroline Ulbricht FerreiraMolecular Biology and Genetic Engineering Center (CBMEG), University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Aline da Costa Lima MoraesMolecular Biology and Genetic Engineering Center (CBMEG), University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Letícia Aparecida de Castro LaraGenetics Department, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture (ESALQ), University of São Paulo (USP), Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
Ricardo José Gonzaga PimentaMolecular Biology and Genetic Engineering Center (CBMEG), University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Estela Araujo CostaInstituto de Ciência e Tecnologia (ICT), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil.
Luciana Rossini PintoAdvanced Center of Sugarcane Agrobusiness Technological Research, Agronomic Institute of Campinas (IAC), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Marcos Guimarães de Andrade LandellAdvanced Center of Sugarcane Agrobusiness Technological Research, Agronomic Institute of Campinas (IAC), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Mateus Figueiredo SantosEmbrapa Beef Cattle, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil.
Liana JankEmbrapa Beef Cattle, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil.
Sanzio Carvalho Lima BarriosEmbrapa Beef Cattle, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil.
Cacilda Borges do ValleEmbrapa Beef Cattle, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil.
Lucimara ChiariEmbrapa Beef Cattle, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil.
Antonio Augusto Franco GarciaGenetics Department, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture (ESALQ), University of São Paulo (USP), Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
Reginaldo Massanobu KuroshuInstituto de Ciência e Tecnologia (ICT), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil.
Ana Carolina LorenaAeronautics Institute of Technology, São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil.
Gregor GorjancThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.
Anete Pereira de SouzaMolecular Biology and Genetic Engineering Center (CBMEG), University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil. anete@unicamp.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poaceae, among the most abundant plant families, includes many economically important polyploid species, such as forage grasses and sugarcane (Saccharum spp.). These species have elevated genomic complexities and limited genetic resources, hindering the application of marker-assisted selection strategies. Currently, the most promising approach for increasing genetic gains in plant breeding is genomic selection. However, due to the polyploidy nature of these polyploid species, more accurate models for incorporating genomic selection into breeding schemes are needed. This study aims to develop a machine learning method by using a joint learning approach to predict complex traits from genotypic data. Biparental populations of sugarcane and two species of forage grasses (Urochloa decumbens, Megathyrsus maximus) were genotyped, and several quantitative traits were measured. High-quality markers were used to predict several traits in different cross-validation scenarios. By combining classification and regression strategies, we developed a predictive system with promising results. Compared with traditional genomic prediction methods, the proposed strategy achieved accuracy improvements exceeding 50%. Our results suggest that the developed methodology could be implemented in breeding programs, helping reduce breeding cycles and increase genetic gains.

Indexed as

PoaceaeSaccharumGenomicsPhenotypePlant BreedingPolyploidy

Identifiers

PMID35864135
PMCPMC9304331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.