Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35864129›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Glimmers of hope in large carnivore recoveries.

Kurt E Ingeman, Lily Z Zhao, Christopher Wolf, David R Williams, Amelia L Ritger, William J Ripple, Kai L Kopecky, Erin M Dillon, Bartholomew P DiFiore, Joseph S Curtis and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Tropical dry woodland loss in India since 1880 and its relation to current megafauna distributions.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The past as a lens for biodiversity conservation on a dynamically changing planet.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kurt E IngemanDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, 2018 Noble Hall, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA. ingeman@ucsb.edu.
Lily Z ZhaoDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, 2018 Noble Hall, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA.
Christopher WolfGlobal Trophic Cascades Program, Forest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.
David R WilliamsSchool of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Amelia L RitgerDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, 2018 Noble Hall, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA.
William J RippleGlobal Trophic Cascades Program, Forest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.
Kai L KopeckyDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, 2018 Noble Hall, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA.
Erin M DillonDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, 2018 Noble Hall, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA.
Bartholomew P DiFioreDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, 2018 Noble Hall, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA.
Joseph S CurtisDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, 2018 Noble Hall, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA.
Samantha R CsikDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, 2018 Noble Hall, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA.
An BuiDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, 2018 Noble Hall, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA.
Adrian C StierDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, 2018 Noble Hall, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA. astier@ucsb.edu.
Oregon State University Cascades · USUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the face of an accelerating extinction crisis, scientists must draw insights from successful conservation interventions to uncover promising strategies for reversing broader declines. Here, we synthesize cases of recovery from a list of 362 species of large carnivores, ecologically important species that function as terminal consumers in many ecological contexts. Large carnivores represent critical conservation targets that have experienced historical declines as a result of direct exploitation and habitat loss. We examine taxonomic and geographic variation in current extinction risk and recovery indices, identify conservation actions associated with positive outcomes, and reveal anthropogenic threats linked to ongoing declines. We find that fewer than 10% of global large carnivore populations are increasing, and only 12 species (3.3%) have experienced genuine improvement in extinction risk, mostly limited to recoveries among marine mammals. Recovery is associated with species legislation enacted at national and international levels, and with management of direct exploitation. Conversely, ongoing declines are robustly linked to threats that include habitat modification and human conflict. Applying lessons from cases of large carnivore recovery will be crucial for restoring intact ecosystems and maintaining the services they provide to humans.

Indexed as

CarnivoraEcosystemAnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesHumansPopulation Density

Identifiers

PMID35864129
PMCPMC9304400
OpenAlexW4286203395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.