Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35864108›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

A nationwide questionnaire study of post-acute symptoms and health problems after SARS-CoV-2 infection in Denmark.

Anna Irene Vedel Sørensen, Lampros Spiliopoulos, Peter Bager, Nete Munk Nielsen, Jørgen Vinsløv Hansen, Anders Koch, Inger Kristine Meder, Steen Ethelberg, Anders Hviid

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. NETosis: A key player in autoimmunity, COVID-19, and long COVID.Journal of translational autoimmunity · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna Irene Vedel SørensenInfectious Disease Epidemiology and Prevention, Statens Serum Institut, 2300, Copenhagen S, Denmark. aivs@ssi.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-3877-4592
Lampros SpiliopoulosDepartment of Epidemiology Research, Statens Serum Institut, 2300, Copenhagen S, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9668-3587
Peter BagerInfectious Disease Epidemiology and Prevention, Statens Serum Institut, 2300, Copenhagen S, Denmark.
Nete Munk NielsenDepartment of Epidemiology Research, Statens Serum Institut, 2300, Copenhagen S, Denmark.
Jørgen Vinsløv HansenDepartment of Epidemiology Research, Statens Serum Institut, 2300, Copenhagen S, Denmark.
Anders KochInfectious Disease Epidemiology and Prevention, Statens Serum Institut, 2300, Copenhagen S, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9205-1048
Inger Kristine MederDepartment of Epidemiology Research, Statens Serum Institut, 2300, Copenhagen S, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0743-419X
Steen EthelbergInfectious Disease Epidemiology and Prevention, Statens Serum Institut, 2300, Copenhagen S, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9709-356X
Anders HviidDepartment of Epidemiology Research, Statens Serum Institut, 2300, Copenhagen S, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7509-9127
Statens Serum Institut · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A considerable number of individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 continue to experience symptoms after the acute phase. Here, we report findings from a nationwide questionnaire study in Denmark including 61,002 RT-PCR confirmed SARS-CoV-2 cases and 91,878 test-negative controls aged 15-years or older. Six to twelve months after the test, the risks of 18 out of 21 symptoms were elevated among test-positives. The largest adjusted risk differences (RD) were observed for dysosmia (RD = 10.92%, 95% CI 10.68-11.21%), dysgeusia (RD = 8.68%, 95% CI 8.43-8.93%), fatigue/exhaustion (RD = 8.43%, 95%CI 8.14-8.74%), dyspnea (RD = 4.87%, 95% CI 4.65-5.09%) and reduced strength in arms/legs (RD = 4.68%, 95% CI 4.45-4.89%). During the period from the test and until completion of the questionnaire, new diagnoses of anxiety (RD = 1.15%, 95% CI 0.95-1.34%) or depression (RD = 1.00%, 95% CI 0.81-1.19%) were also more common among test-positives. Even in a population where the majority of test-positives were not hospitalized, a considerable proportion experiences symptoms up to 12 months after infection. Being female or middle-aged increases risks.

Indexed as

COVID-19Olfaction DisordersDenmarkFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2Surveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID35864108
PMCPMC9302226
OpenAlexW4286494541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.