Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35863036›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2022

Avoiding False-Positive SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test Results with Point-of-Care Molecular Testing on Residual Test Buffer.

Jason J LeBlanc, Gregory R McCracken, Barbara Goodall, Todd F Hatchette, Lisa Barrett, John Ross, Ross J Davidson, Glenn Patriquin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Implementation of isotermic PCR for detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jason J LeBlancDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Division of Microbiology, Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0593-0357
Gregory R McCrackenDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Division of Microbiology, Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Barbara GoodallDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Division of Microbiology, Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Todd F HatchetteDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Division of Microbiology, Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Lisa BarrettDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Division of Microbiology, Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
John RossPraxes Medical Group, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Ross J DavidsonDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Division of Microbiology, Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Glenn PatriquinDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Division of Microbiology, Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8674-4358
Dalhousie University · CANova Scotia Health Authority · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antigen-based rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) have been widely used for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. In settings of low disease prevalence, such as asymptomatic community testing, national guidelines recommend confirmation of positive Ag-RDT results with a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT). This often requires patients to be recalled for repeat specimen recollection and subsequent testing in reference laboratories. This project assessed the use of a point-of-care molecular NAAT for SARS-CoV-2 detection (i.e., ID NOW), which was performed on-site at a volunteer-led asymptomatic community testing site on the residual test buffer (RTB) from positive Ag-RDTs. The ID NOW NAAT assay was performed on RTB from two Ag-RDTs: the Abbott Panbio and BTNX Rapid Response assays. Results of ID NOW were compared to real-time RT-PCR at a reference laboratory. Along with investigations into the clinical performance of ID NOW on RTB, analytical specificity was assessed with a panel of various respiratory organisms. Of the Ag-RDTs results evaluated, all 354 Ag-RDTs results characterized as true positives by RT-PCR were accurately identified with ID NOW testing of RTB. No SARS-CoV-2 detections by ID NOW were observed from 10 specimens characterized as false-positive Ag-RDTs, or from contrived specimens with various respiratory organisms. The use of on-site molecular testing on RTB provides a suitable option for rapid confirmatory testing of positive Ag-RDTs, thereby obviating the need for specimen recollection for molecular testing at local reference laboratories.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsHumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesPoint-of-Care SystemsSARS-CoV-2Sensitivity and SpecificityantigenbufferCOVID-19false-positiveIDNOWPanbioPCRPOCrapidrapid testsresidualSARS-CoV-2sensitivityspecificity

Identifiers

PMID35863036
PMCPMC9430663
OpenAlexW4285086369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.