Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35862939›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2022

Limited Correlation between SARS-CoV-2 Serologic Assays for Identification of High-Titer COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma Using FDA Thresholds.

Nicholas E Larkey, Radwa Ewaisha, Michael A Lasho, Matthew M Roforth, Dane Granger, Calvin R Jerde, Liang Wu, Amy Gorsh, Stephen A Klassen, Jonathon W Senefeld and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Evidence for the Efficacy of COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Nicholas E Larkey *Division of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinicgrid.66875.3a, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Radwa Ewaisha *Division of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinicgrid.66875.3a, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Michael A LashoDivision of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinicgrid.66875.3a, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Matthew M RoforthAdvanced Diagnostics Laboratory, Mayo Clinicgrid.66875.3a, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Dane GrangerDivision of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinicgrid.66875.3a, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Calvin R JerdeAdvanced Diagnostics Laboratory, Mayo Clinicgrid.66875.3a, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Liang WuDivision of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinicgrid.66875.3a, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Amy GorshDivision of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinicgrid.66875.3a, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Stephen A KlassenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinicgrid.66875.3a, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Jonathon W SenefeldDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinicgrid.66875.3a, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Michael J JoynerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinicgrid.66875.3a, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Nikola A BaumannDivision of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinicgrid.66875.3a, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Elitza S TheelDivision of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinicgrid.66875.3a, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6886-2294
John R MillsDivision of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinicgrid.66875.3a, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1025-4760
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In August 2020, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) specified 12 authorized serologic assays and associated assay-specific cutoff values for the selection of high-titer CCP for use in hospitalized patients. The criteria used for establishing these cutoff values remains unclear. Here, we compare the overall agreement and concordance of five serologic assays included in the August 2020 FDA EUA at both the manufacturer-recommended qualitative cutoff thresholds and at the FDA-indicated thresholds for high-titer CCP, using serum samples collected as part of the CCP Expanded Access Program (EAP). The qualitative positive percent agreement (PPA) across assays ranged from 92.3% to 98.8%. However, the high-titer categorization across assays varied significantly, with the PPA ranging from 26.5% to 82.7%. The Roche anti-NC ECLIA provided the lowest agreement compared to all other assays. Efforts to optimize high-titer cutoffs could reduce, although not eliminate, the discordance across assays. The consequences of using nonstandardized assays are apparent in our study, and the high-titer cutoffs chosen for each assay are not directly comparable to each other. The generalized findings in our study will be relevant to any future use of convalescent plasma for either COVID-19 or future pandemics of newly emerged pathogens.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Antibodies, ViralCOVID-19 SerotherapyCOVID-19 TestingHumansImmunization, PassiveUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationAntibodies, Viralantibodyassay standardizationCCPCOVID-19 convalescent plasmaFDA EUAhigh-titer convalescent plasmaSARS-CoV-2serological assaysserology

Identifiers

PMID35862939
PMCPMC9430146
OpenAlexW4283812715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.