Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35862873›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2022

Twenty-Year Benefit From Adjuvant Goserelin and Tamoxifen in Premenopausal Patients With Breast Cancer in a Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial.

Annelie Johansson, Huma Dar, Laura J van 't Veer, Nicholas P Tobin, Gizeh Perez-Tenorio, Anna Nordenskjöld, Ulla Johansson, Johan Hartman, Lambert Skoog, Christina Yau and 6 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Final outcomes of the SOFT and TEXT phase III trials in premenopausal hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2026
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Sex and age disparities in goserelin safety: a global pharmacovigilance study.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Roles of Goserelin in Gynecological Disorders.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026
    Review
  8. Response to Zhu, Bu, and Zhu.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Effects of the efficacy of theFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Cancers · 2023
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Annelie JohanssonDepartment of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9029-1996
Huma DarDepartment of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0710-1448
Laura J van 't VeerDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-9838-8298
Nicholas P TobinDepartment of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Gizeh Perez-TenorioDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences and Department of Oncology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Anna NordenskjöldInstitution of Clinical Sciences, Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Ulla JohanssonOncological Centre, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Johan HartmanDepartment of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lambert SkoogDepartment of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Christina YauBuck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-1937-0859
Christopher C BenzBuck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, CA.
Laura J EssermanDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.ORCID 0000-0001-9202-4568
Olle StålDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences and Department of Oncology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Bo NordenskjöldDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences and Department of Oncology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Tommy FornanderDepartment of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Linda S LindströmDepartment of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

Elucidating the molecular and contextual basis for IDLE ultralow risk lesions and the tumor immune microenvironment of high risk in situ and invasive breast cancersU01CA196406 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BOROWSKY, ALEXANDER D, ESSERMAN, LAURA J · 2015 to 2020
$5.8M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA196406
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the long-term (20-year) endocrine therapy benefit in premenopausal patients with breast cancer.

methodsSecondary analysis of the Stockholm trial (STO-5, 1990-1997) randomly assigning 924 premenopausal patients to 2 years of goserelin (3.6 mg subcutaneously once every 28 days), tamoxifen (40 mg orally once daily), combined goserelin and tamoxifen, or no adjuvant endocrine therapy (control) is performed. Random assignment was stratified by lymph node status; lymph node-positive patients (n = 459) were allocated to standard chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil). Primary tumor immunohistochemistry (n = 731) and gene expression profiling (n = 586) were conducted in 2020. The 70-gene signature identified genomic low-risk and high-risk patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis, multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression, and multivariable time-varying flexible parametric modeling assessed the long-term distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI). Swedish high-quality registries allowed a complete follow-up of 20 years.

resultsIn estrogen receptor-positive patients (n = 584, median age 47 years), goserelin, tamoxifen, and the combination significantly improved long-term distant recurrence-free interval compared with control (multivariable hazard ratio [HR], 0.49; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.75, HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.87, and HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.94, respectively). Significant goserelin-tamoxifen interaction was observed (

conclusionThis study shows 20-year benefit from 2 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy in estrogen receptor-positive premenopausal patients and suggests differential treatment benefit on the basis of tumor genomic characteristics. Combined goserelin and tamoxifen therapy showed no benefit over single treatment. Long-term follow-up to assess treatment benefit is critical.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsGoserelinTamoxifenFemaleGenomicsHumansMiddle AgedPremenopauseReceptors, EstrogenGoserelinReceptors, EstrogenTamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID35862873
PMCPMC9746735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.