ArticlemBio2022
Enzymatic Specificity of Conserved Rho GTPase Deamidases Promotes Invasion of Vibrio parahaemolyticus at the Expense of Infection.
Article in mBio, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vibrio parahaemolyticus is among the leading causes of bacterial seafood-borne acute gastroenteritis. Like many intracellular pathogens, V. parahaemolyticus invades host cells during infection by deamidating host small Rho GTPases. The Rho GTPase deamidating activity of VopC, a type 3 secretion system (T3SS) translocated effector, drives V. parahaemolyticus invasion. The intracellular pathogen uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) invades host cells by secreting a VopC homolog, the secreted toxin cytotoxic necrotizing factor 1 (CNF1). Because of the homology between VopC and CNF1, we hypothesized that topical application of CNF1 during V. parahaemolyticus infection could supplement VopC activity. Here, we demonstrate that CNF1 improves the efficiency of V. parahaemolyticus invasion, a bottleneck in V. parahaemolyticus infection, across a range of doses. CNF1 increases V. parahaemolyticus invasion independent of both VopC and the T3SS altogether but leaves a disproportionate fraction of intracellular bacteria unable to escape the endosome and complete their infection cycle. This phenomenon holds true in the presence or absence of VopC but is particularly pronounced in the absence of a T3SS. The native VopC, by contrast, promotes a far less efficient invasion but permits the majority of internalized bacteria to escape the endosome and complete their infection cycle. These studies highlight the significance of enzymatic specificity during infection, as virulence factors (VopC and CNF1 in this instance) with similarities in function (bacterial uptake), catalytic activity (deamidation), and substrates (Rho GTPases) are not sufficiently interchangeable for mediating a successful invasion for neighboring bacterial pathogens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.