ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2022
Selection of
Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anabaena-a promising chassis for space exploration.NPJ microgravity · 2026Review
- Emerging Chemical and Biological Materials Technologies in the Extraplanetary Environment.Nano-micro letters · 2026Review
- Integrating resource utilization and bioregenerative life support systems for sustainable space exploration.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Proteomics of long-term acclimation of the desert cyanobacteriumCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2026Article
- Cyanobacteria Under UV Radiation: General Insights into Stress Responses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Dependence of cyanobacterium growth and Mars-specific photobioreactor mass on total pressure, pNNPJ microgravity · 2024Article
- Cultivation ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Surface-displayed silicatein-α enzyme in bioengineeredFrontiers in systems biology · 2024Article
- Community-scale models of microbiomes: Articulating metabolic modelling and metagenome sequencing.Microbial biotechnology · 2024Review
- Microbial biomanufacturing for space-exploration-what to take and when to make.Nature communications · 2023Review
- Microbial growth in actual martian regolith in the form of Mars meteorite EETA79001.Communications earth & environment · 2023Article
- On the growth dynamics of the cyanobacterium Anabaena sp. PCC 7938 in Martian regolith.NPJ microgravity · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Crewed missions to Mars are expected to take place in the coming decades. After short-term stays, a permanent presence will be desirable to enable a wealth of scientific discoveries. This will require providing crews with life-support consumables in amounts that are too large to be imported from Earth. Part of these consumables could be produced on site with bioprocesses, but the feedstock should not have to be imported. A solution under consideration lies in using diazotrophic, rock-weathering cyanobacteria as primary producers: fed with materials naturally available on site, they would provide the nutrients required by other organisms. This concept has recently gained momentum but progress is slowed by a lack of consistency across contributing teams, and notably of a shared model organism. With the hope to address this issue, we present the work performed to select our current model. We started with preselected strains from the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.