Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35862669›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2022

Interspecific Interactions Drive Nonribosomal Peptide Production in Nodularia spumigena.

Sandra Lage, Hanna Mazur-Marzec, Elena Gorokhova

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sandra LageDepartment of Environmental Science, Stockholm Universitygrid.10548.38, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0167-7163
Hanna Mazur-MarzecDivision of Marine Biotechnology, Institute of Oceanography, University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6526-4045
Elena GorokhovaDepartment of Environmental Science, Stockholm Universitygrid.10548.38, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4192-6956
Stockholm University · SEUniversity of Gdańsk · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nodularia spumigena is a bloom-forming cyanobacterium that produces several classes of nonribosomal peptides (NRPs) that are biologically active; however, the ecological roles of specific NRPs remain largely unknown. Here, we explored the involvement of NRPs produced by N. spumigena in interspecific interactions by coculturing the cyanobacterium and its algal competitors, the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum and the cryptomonad Rhodomonas salina, and measuring NRP levels and growth responses in all three species. Contrary to the expected growth suppression in the algae, it was N. spumigena that was adversely affected by the diatom, while the cryptomonad had no effect. Reciprocal effects of N. spumigena on the algae were manifested as the prolonged lag phase in R. salina and growth stimulation in P. tricornutum; however, these responses were largely attributed to elevated pH and not to specific NRPs. Nevertheless, the NRP levels in the cocultures were significantly higher than in the monocultures, with an up to 5-fold upregulation of cell-bound nodularins and exudation of nodularin and anabaenopeptin. Thus, chemically mediated interspecific interactions can promote NRP production and release by cyanobacteria, resulting in increased input of these compounds into the water.

Indexed as

CyanobacteriaDiatomsNodulariaPeptidesPeptidesallelopathyanabaenopeptinsBaltic Seacoculturenodularinsspumigins

Identifiers

PMID35862669
PMCPMC9361812
OpenAlexW4285093794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.