Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35862405›Full record

ArticleHealth & social care in the community2022

The quality of life of older carers and the people they support: An international scoping review.

Wenjing Zhang, Stacey Rand, Alisoun Milne, Grace Collins, Barbora Silarova

Open access · hybridAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Health & social care in the community, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Longitudinal associations between congruence in dyadic care type and health-related quality of life among multiple chronic conditions patient-caregiver dyads.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wenjing ZhangCentre for Health Services Studies (CHSS), University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1810-791X
Stacey RandPersonal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9071-2842
Alisoun MilneSchool of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Grace CollinsPersonal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0144-9411
Barbora SilarovaPersonal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2473-2527
University of Kent · GB

Funding

Department of Health 23063
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Older carers, aged 65 or over, may find it difficult to balance caring while maintaining their own health and quality of life (QoL). For older carers, especially, established approaches to separately identifying, assessing and addressing carers' and care-recipients' needs, may not fully consider the interwoven nature of caregiving relationships and the ways in which community-based social care services may impact the QoL of both parties. The purpose of this scoping review is to identify and synthesise what is already known about the QoL of older carers and care-recipients, considered together, which we refer to as 'dyadic QoL'; both in general, and with regard to the impact of community-based social care. We searched 16 electronic databases and grey literature in October and November 2020. A total 822 items were identified and reviewed based on the inclusion criteria: focusing on older carers and care-recipients from a dyadic perspective and their QoL or well-being, published since 2000 and in English. Fourteen papers were thematically analysed, and the findings were presented under two themes. First, the value of applying an overarching conceptual framework of 'interdependence theory' in understanding dyadic QoL, including two broad approaches: dyadic data analysis and the dynamics of caring relationships. Second, a number of papers highlighted the role of support from family, friends and neighbours and community-based social care services in promoting QoL outcomes of caring dyads. This review emphasised that considering the QoL of carers and care-recipients, together, would potentially improve the understanding of care needs, provision of care services and QoL outcomes. However, there is limited and fragmentary evidence about dyadic QoL or the impact of social care services on dyadic QoL outcomes. Future work is required to explore and evaluate the use of a dyadic approach in social care practice and research.

Indexed as

CaregiversQuality of LifeFriendsHumansSocial SupportSocial Workcarercare-recipientdyadlong-term carequality of lifesocial care

Identifiers

PMID35862405
PMCPMC10084354
OpenAlexW4286492718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.