Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35862402›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Blindness and visual impairment and their causes in India: Results of a nationally representative survey.

Praveen Vashist, Suraj Singh Senjam, Vivek Gupta, Noopur Gupta, B R Shamanna, Meenakshi Wadhwani, Pallavi Shukla, Souvik Manna, Saumya Yadav, Amit Bharadwaj

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
18.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 132 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Barriers and Enablers to Seeking Eye Care Among the Adult Indian Population: A Systematic Review.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Eye banking in India: Planning for 2050.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Validity and Reliability of WHOeyes Application in Community-based Visual Acuity Screening Program.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2026
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Praveen VashistCommunity Ophthalmology, Dr. R P Centre, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-1250-7373
Suraj Singh SenjamCommunity Ophthalmology, Dr. R P Centre, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Vivek GuptaCommunity Ophthalmology, Dr. R P Centre, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Noopur GuptaOphthalmology, Dr. R P Centre, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8022-6656
B R ShamannaSchool of Medical Sciences, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana.
Meenakshi WadhwaniChacha Nehru Bal Chikitsalaya, New Delhi, India.
Pallavi ShuklaInstitute Rotary Cancer Hospital, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Souvik MannaCommunity Ophthalmology, Dr. R P Centre, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8870-8542
Saumya YadavCommunity Ophthalmology, Dr. R P Centre, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-1788-4549
Amit BharadwajAIIMS, New Delhi, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Raipur · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhopal · INChacha Nehru Bal Chikitsalaya · INUniversity of Hyderabad · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAvoidable blindness is a significant public health problem in India. Nationally representative RAAB surveys (Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness) are being conducted periodically in the country to know the current status of blindness in the country. The current study describes the findings from the RAAB survey conducted during 2015-19 in India. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional, population-based survey was conducted across the entire country among persons aged 50 years and above using RAAB version 6 methodology. Presenting and pinhole visual acuity was recorded followed by lens examination using a torchlight. In order to estimate the prevalence of blindness and visual impairment in overall population in India, district weights were assigned to each of the 31 surveyed districts and the prevalence was standardized using the RAAB software.

resultsThe overall weighted, age-gender standardized, prevalence of blindness (presenting visual acuity <3/60 in better eye) in population aged ≥50 years was 1.99% (95% CI 1.94%, 2.13%) and of visual impairment (VI) (presenting visual acuity <6/12 in better eye) was 26.68% (95% CI 26.57-27.17%). On multivariate analysis, adjusted odds ratio showed that blindness was associated with age ≥ 80 years (OR = 20.3, 95% CI: 15.6-26.4) and being illiterate (OR = 5.6, 95% CI: 3.6-8.9). Blindness was not found to be significantly associated with either gender or locality.

conclusionThe results of the survey demonstrate that currently more than one fourth of persons aged 50 years and above are visually impaired (PVA<6/12 in better eye) in India. The prevalence of blindness among them is 1.99%, and older age and illiteracy are significantly associated with blindness. Major causes of blindness included cataract (66.2%), corneal opacity (CO) (8.2%), cataract surgical complications (7.2%), posterior segment disorders (5.9%) and glaucoma (5.5%). The proportion of blindness and visual impairment that is due to avoidable causes include 92.9% and 97.4% respectively.

Indexed as

CataractPersons with Visual DisabilitiesVision, LowBlindnessCross-Sectional StudiesHumansIndiaPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID35862402
PMCPMC9302795
OpenAlexW4286498522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.