ArticlePloS one2022
Artificial intelligence in medical education curriculum: An e-Delphi study for competencies.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Content and structural needs assessment for an artificial intelligence education mobile app in healthcare: a mixed methods study.BMC medical education · 2025Pooled it
- [Medical education and artificial intelligence: perspectives and ethical challenges].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2025Pooled it
- AI in the Health Sector: Systematic Review of Key Skills for Future Health Professionals.JMIR medical education · 2025Pooled it
- AI Integration in Undergraduate Medical Education: Qualitative Study of Faculty Perspectives in the United Arab Emirates.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Spiritual Care: Modified Delphi Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Integration in U.S. Healthcare Professional Degree Programs: A Rapid Scoping Review.Research square · 2026Article
- AI-Assisted Formative Assessment in Clinical Education: From Algorithms to Agency.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- A Student-Centered Approach Towards Implementing Large Language Models (LLMs) in Medical Education.Medical science educator · 2026Article
- How does AI perform compared to human expert panels in medical Delphi studies? A pilot study through the lens of pathology.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence literacy and readiness in future health care professionals: a cross-sectional study.Croatian medical journal · 2026Article
- AI Competency: Current State and Challenges.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Dental students' knowledge, perceptions, and educational needs regarding artificial intelligence: a multinational cross-sectional survey.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Evaluation of a Problem-Based Learning Program's Effect on Artificial Intelligence Ethics Among Japanese Medical Students: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Development of a Pilot Artificial Intelligence Education Curriculum for Hospital Staff.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026Article
- What and when: a Delphi study identifying AI competencies and learning objectives for medical students.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- AI literacy in undergraduate medical education: a competency-based interpretive framework for curriculum and assessment.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Twelve tips for developing and implementing AI curriculum for undergraduate medical education.Medical education online · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in undergraduate medical education: an updated scoping review.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- A Practical Guide to Using Futures Methods in Health Care: Approaches, Applications, and Case Studies.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Education: Applications, Ethics, and Future Perspectives.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) has affected our day-to-day in a great extent. Healthcare industry is one of the mainstream fields among those and produced a noticeable change in treatment and education. Medical students must comprehend well why AI technologies mediate and frame their decisions on medical issues. Formalizing of instruction on AI concepts can facilitate learners to grasp AI outcomes in association with their sensory perceptions and thinking in the dynamic and ambiguous reality of daily medical practice. The purpose of this study is to provide consensus on the competencies required by medical graduates to be ready for artificial intelligence technologies and possible applications in medicine and reporting the results. MATERIALS AND
methodsA three-round e-Delphi survey was conducted between February 2020 and November 2020. The Delphi panel accorporated experts from different backgrounds; (i) healthcare professionals/ academicians; (ii) computer and data science professionals/ academics; (iii) law and ethics professionals/ academics; and (iv) medical students. Round 1 in the Delphi survey began with exploratory open-ended questions. Responses received in the first round evaluated and refined to a 27-item questionnaire which then sent to the experts to be rated using a 7-point Likert type scale (1: Strongly Disagree-7: Strongly Agree). Similar to the second round, the participants repeated their assessments in the third round by using the second-round analysis. The agreement level and strength of the consensus was decided based on third phase results. Median scores was used to calculate the agreement level and the interquartile range (IQR) was used for determining the strength of the consensus.
resultsAmong 128 invitees, a total of 94 agreed to become members of the expert panel. Of them 75 (79.8%) completed the Round 1 questionnaire, 69/75 (92.0%) completed the Round 2 and 60/69 (87.0%) responded to the Round 3. There was a strong agreement on the 23 items and weak agreement on the 4 items.
conclusionsThis study has provided a consensus list of the competencies required by the medical graduates to be ready for AI implications that would bring new perspectives to medical education curricula. The unique feature of the current research is providing a guiding role in integrating AI into curriculum processes, syllabus content and training of medical students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.