Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35862385›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

High prevalence of p16 staining in malignant tumors.

Noémi De Wispelaere, Sebastian Dwertmann Rico, Marcus Bauer, Andreas M Luebke, Martina Kluth, Franziska Büscheck, Claudia Hube-Magg, Doris Höflmayer, Natalia Gorbokon, Sören Weidemann and 20 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Pathology according to p53 Pathway.Pathobiology : journal of immunopathology, molecular and cellular biology · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Noémi De WispelaereInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Sebastian Dwertmann RicoInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Marcus BauerInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Andreas M LuebkeInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Martina KluthInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Franziska BüscheckInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Claudia Hube-MaggInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Doris HöflmayerInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Natalia GorbokonInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Sören WeidemannInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Katharina MöllerInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Christoph FrauneInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Christian BernreutherInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Ronald SimonInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0158-4258
Christian KählerInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Anne MenzInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Andrea HinschInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Frank JacobsenInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Patrick LebokInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Till ClauditzInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Guido SauterInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Ria UhligInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Waldemar WilczakInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Stefan SteurerInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Eike BurandtInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Rainer KrechInstitute of Pathology, Clinical Center Osnabrueck, Osnabrueck, Germany.
David DumInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Till KrechInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Andreas MarxInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Sarah MinnerInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Universität Hamburg · DEOsnabrück University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

p16 (CDKN2A) is a member of the INK4 class of cell cycle inhibitors, which is often dysregulated in cancer. However, the prevalence of p16 expression in different cancer types is controversial. 15,783 samples from 124 different tumor types and 76 different normal tissue types were analyzed by immunohistochemistry in a tissue microarray format. p16 was detectable in 5,292 (45.0%) of 11,759 interpretable tumors. Except from adenohypophysis in islets of Langerhans, p16 staining was largely absent in normal tissues. In cancer, highest positivity rates were observed in uterine cervix squamous cell carcinomas (94.4%), non-invasive papillary urothelial carcinoma, pTaG2 (100%), Merkel cell carcinoma (97.7%), and small cell carcinomas of various sites of origin (54.5%-100%). All 124 tumor categories showed at least occasional p16 immunostaining. Comparison with clinico-pathological data in 128 vulvar, 149 endometrial, 295 serous ovarian, 396 pancreatic, 1365 colorectal, 284 gastric, and 1245 urinary bladder cancers, 910 breast carcinomas, 620 clear cell renal cell carcinomas, and 414 testicular germ cell tumors revealed only few statistically significant associations. Comparison of human papilloma virus (HPV) status and p16 in 497 squamous cell carcinomas of different organs revealed HPV in 80.4% of p16 positive and in 20.6% of p16 negative cancers (p<0.0001). It is concluded, that a positive and especially strong p16 immunostaining is a feature for malignancy which may be diagnostically useful in lipomatous, urothelial and possibly other tumors. The imperfect association between p16 immunostaining and HPV infection with high variability between different sites of origin challenges the use of p16 immunohistochemistry as a surrogate for HPV positivity, except in tumors of cervix uteri and the penis.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellCarcinoma, Transitional CellPapillomavirus InfectionsUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16DNA, ViralFemaleHumansPapillomaviridaePrevalenceStaining and LabelingBiomarkers, TumorCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16DNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID35862385
PMCPMC9302831
OpenAlexW4286489461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.