ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2022
Venc Design and Velocity Estimation for Phase Contrast MRI.
Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Maximum Likelihood Estimation in Mixed Integer Linear Models.IEEE signal processing letters · 2023Article
- MAXIMIZING UNAMBIGUOUS VELOCITY RANGE IN PHASE-CONTRAST MRI WITH MULTIPOINT ENCODING.Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging · 2022Article
- Alias-Free Arrays.IEEE signal processing letters · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI), spin velocity contributes to the phase measured at each voxel. Therefore, estimating velocity from potentially wrapped phase measurements is the task of solving a system of noisy congruence equations. We propose Phase Recovery from Multiple Wrapped Measurements (PRoM) as a fast, approximate maximum likelihood estimator of velocity from multi-coil data with possible amplitude attenuation due to dephasing. The estimator can recover the fullest possible extent of unambiguous velocities, which can greatly exceed twice the highest venc. The estimator uses all pairwise phase differences and the inherent correlations among them to minimize the estimation error. Correlations are directly estimated from multi-coil data without requiring knowledge of coil sensitivity maps, dephasing factors, or the actual per-voxel signal-to-noise ratio. Derivation of the estimator yields explicit probabilities of unwrapping errors and the probability distribution for the velocity estimate; this, in turn, allows for optimized design of the phase-encoded acquisition. These probabilities are also incorporated into spatial post-processing to further mitigate wrapping errors. Simulation, phantom, and in vivo results for three-point PC-MRI acquisitions validate the benefits of reduced estimation error, increased recovered velocity range, optimized acquisition, and fast computation. A phantom study at 1.5T demonstrates 48.5% decrease in root mean squared error using PRoM with post-processing versus a conventional "dual-venc" technique. Simulation and 3T in vivo results likewise demonstrate the proposed benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.