Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35862266›Full record

SynthesisDrug and alcohol review2023

Pharmacological treatment for methamphetamine withdrawal: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Liam S Acheson, Benjamin H Williams, Michael Farrell, Rebecca McKetin, Nadine Ezard, Krista J Siefried

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Drug and alcohol review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The use ofFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Methamphetamine dependence in Australia-why is 'ice' (crystal meth) so addictive?Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Liam S AchesonThe National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2343-5504
Benjamin H WilliamsDepartment of Psychiatry, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia.
Michael FarrellThe National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Rebecca McKetinThe National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2833-4830
Nadine EzardThe National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Krista J SiefriedThe National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6534-3325
UNSW Sydney · AUAlcohol and Drug Foundation · AURoyal Prince Alfred Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

issuesCessation of methamphetamine use may result in a characteristic withdrawal syndrome, no medication has been approved for this indication. This systematic review aims to assess the efficacy of pharmacotherapy for methamphetamine withdrawal, the first comprehensive meta-analysis since 2008. APPROACH: MEDLINE (1966-2020), CINAHL (1982-2020), PsychINFO (1806-2020) and EMBASE (1947-2020) were systematically searched. Studies were included if they were randomised controlled trials (RCT) investigating pharmacological treatments for methamphetamine withdrawal, reviewing outcomes of treatment discontinuation, mental health outcomes, withdrawal symptoms (including craving) and patient safety. The relative risk (RR) and weighted mean difference (MD) were used to meta-analyse dichotomous and continuous data respectively, with 95% confidence intervals. Risk of bias and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) assessments were conducted. KEY

findingsNine RCTs of six medications (n = 242 participants) met inclusion criteria, however, only six trials of four medications (n = 186) could be meta-analysed. Mean sample size across studies was 27 participants, and 88% of participants were male. The quality of evidence in this review varies from low to very low on GRADE assessments. Amineptine may reduce discontinuation rates (RR 0.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.07, 0.72, p = 0.01), and improve global state (MD -0.49, 95% CI -0.80, -0.17), compared with placebo, however, this medication is no longer approved. No other medications improved any domain when compared with placebo. Due to lack of reporting safety profiles could not be established.

conclusionsThere is insufficient evidence to indicate any medication is effective for the treatment of methamphetamine withdrawal. The poor quality of the evidence indicates a need for better powered, high-quality trials.

Indexed as

MethamphetamineSubstance Withdrawal SyndromeFemaleHumansMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicMethamphetaminedrug therapymethamphetaminesubstance-related disordersystematic reviewwithdrawal

Identifiers

PMID35862266
PMCPMC10083934
OpenAlexW4286494502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.