Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35862194›Full record

ArticleStroke2022

Use of Clinical Pathway Simulation and Machine Learning to Identify Key Levers for Maximizing the Benefit of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Stroke.

Michael Allen, Charlotte James, Julia Frost, Kristin Liabo, Kerry Pearn, Thomas Monks, Richard Everson, Ken Stein, Martin James

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stroke, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. What's the Future of Vascular Neurology?Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael AllenMedical School, University of Exeter, St Luke's Campus, United Kingdom (M.A., C.J., J.F., K.L., K.P., T.M., K.S.).ORCID 0000-0002-8746-9957
Charlotte JamesMedical School, University of Exeter, St Luke's Campus, United Kingdom (M.A., C.J., J.F., K.L., K.P., T.M., K.S.).ORCID 0000-0003-4850-5318
Julia FrostMedical School, University of Exeter, St Luke's Campus, United Kingdom (M.A., C.J., J.F., K.L., K.P., T.M., K.S.).ORCID 0000-0002-3503-5911
Kristin LiaboMedical School, University of Exeter, St Luke's Campus, United Kingdom (M.A., C.J., J.F., K.L., K.P., T.M., K.S.).ORCID 0000-0002-7052-1261
Kerry PearnMedical School, University of Exeter, St Luke's Campus, United Kingdom (M.A., C.J., J.F., K.L., K.P., T.M., K.S.).ORCID 0000-0003-2786-4426
Thomas MonksMedical School, University of Exeter, St Luke's Campus, United Kingdom (M.A., C.J., J.F., K.L., K.P., T.M., K.S.).ORCID 0000-0003-2631-4481
Richard EversonComputer Science, University of Exeter, Streatham Campus, United Kingdom (R.E.).ORCID 0000-0002-3964-1150
Ken SteinMedical School, University of Exeter, St Luke's Campus, United Kingdom (M.A., C.J., J.F., K.L., K.P., T.M., K.S.).ORCID 0000-0002-5842-9972
Martin JamesRoyal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom (M.J.).ORCID 0000-0001-6065-6018
University of Exeter · GBRoyal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health 17/99/89
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExpert opinion is that about 20% of emergency stroke patients should receive thrombolysis. Currently, 11% to 12% of patients in England and Wales receive thrombolysis, ranging from 2% to 24% between hospitals. The aim of this study was to assess how much variation is due to differences in local patient populations, and how much is due to differences in clinical decision-making and stroke pathway performance, while estimating a realistic target thrombolysis use.

methodsAnonymised data for 246 676 emergency stroke admissions to 132 acute hospitals in England and Wales between 2016 and 2018 was obtained from the Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme data. We used machine learning to learn decisions on who to give thrombolysis to at each hospital. We used clinical pathway simulation to model effects of changing pathway performance. Qualitative research was used to assess clinician attitudes to these methods. Three changes were modeled: (1) arrival-to-treatment in 30 minutes, (2) proportion of patients with determined stroke onset times set to at least the national upper quartile, (3) thrombolysis decisions made based on majority vote of a benchmark set of hospitals.

resultsOf the modeled changes, any single change was predicted to increase national thrombolysis use from 11.6% to between 12.3% to 14.5% (clinical decision-making having the most effect). Combined, these changes would be expected to increase thrombolysis to 18.3%, but there would still be significant variation between hospitals depending on local patient population. Clinicians engaged well with the modeling, but those from hospitals with lower thrombolysis use were most cautious about the methods.

conclusionsMachine learning and clinical pathway simulation may be applied at scale to national stroke audit data, allowing extended use and analysis of audit data. Stroke thrombolysis rates of at least 18% look achievable in England and Wales, but each hospital should have its own target.

Indexed as

Critical PathwaysStrokeAdministration, IntravenousFibrinolytic AgentsHumansMachine LearningThrombolytic TherapyFibrinolytic Agentsclinical pathwaysdecision makinghospitalsmachine learningqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID35862194
PMCPMC9389935
OpenAlexW4285594173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.