Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35862172›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2022

Classification of Twitter Vaping Discourse Using BERTweet: Comparative Deep Learning Study.

William Baker, Jason B Colditz, Page D Dobbs, Huy Mai, Shyam Visweswaran, Justin Zhan, Brian A Primack

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Identifying E-cigarette Content on TikTok: Using a BERTopic Modeling Approach.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Article
  5. Categorizing E-cigarette-related tweets using BERT topic modeling.Emerging trends in drugs, addictions, and health · 2024
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

William Baker *Department of Computer Science and Computer Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1013-3491
Jason B ColditzDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2811-841X
Page D DobbsHealth, Human Performance and Recreation Department, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1913-6488
Huy MaiDepartment of Computer Science and Computer Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4945-4316
Shyam VisweswaranDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2079-8684
Justin ZhanDepartment of Computer Science and Computer Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8991-5669
Brian A PrimackCollege of Public Health and Human Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5962-0939

Funding

Leveraging Twitter to monitor nicotine and tobacco-related cancer communicationR01CA225773 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI PRIMACK, BRIAN A. · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
Development and Evaluation of a Learning Electronic Medical Record SystemR01LM012095 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI VISWESWARAN, SHYAM · 2015 to 2018
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA225773NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTwitter provides a valuable platform for the surveillance and monitoring of public health topics; however, manually categorizing large quantities of Twitter data is labor intensive and presents barriers to identify major trends and sentiments. Additionally, while machine and deep learning approaches have been proposed with high accuracy, they require large, annotated data sets. Public pretrained deep learning classification models, such as BERTweet, produce higher-quality models while using smaller annotated training sets.

objectiveThis study aims to derive and evaluate a pretrained deep learning model based on BERTweet that can identify tweets relevant to vaping, tweets (related to vaping) of commercial nature, and tweets with provape sentiment. Additionally, the performance of the BERTweet classifier will be compared against a long short-term memory (LSTM) model to show the improvements a pretrained model has over traditional deep learning approaches.

methodsTwitter data were collected from August to October 2019 using vaping-related search terms. From this set, a random subsample of 2401 English tweets was manually annotated for relevance (vaping related or not), commercial nature (commercial or not), and sentiment (positive, negative, or neutral). Using the annotated data, 3 separate classifiers were built using BERTweet with the default parameters defined by the Simple Transformer application programming interface (API). Each model was trained for 20 iterations and evaluated with a random split of the annotated tweets, reserving 10% (n=165) of tweets for evaluations.

resultsThe relevance, commercial, and sentiment classifiers achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 94.5%, 99.3%, and 81.7%, respectively. Additionally, the weighted F1 scores of each were 97.6%, 99.0%, and 86.1%, respectively. We found that BERTweet outperformed the LSTM model in the classification of all categories.

conclusionsLarge, open-source deep learning classifiers, such as BERTweet, can provide researchers the ability to reliably determine if tweets are relevant to vaping; include commercial content; and include positive, negative, or neutral content about vaping with a higher accuracy than traditional natural language processing deep learning models. Such enhancement to the utilization of Twitter data can allow for faster exploration and dissemination of time-sensitive data than traditional methodologies (eg, surveys, polling research).

Indexed as

deep learninginfoveillancesocial mediatransformer modelsvaping

Identifiers

PMID35862172
PMCPMC9353682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.