ArticleDie Naturwissenschaften2022
Can nuclear aquatic environmental DNA be a genetic marker for the accurate estimation of species abundance?
Article in Die Naturwissenschaften, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- pH-Dependent Degradation of Macrobial Environmental DNA in Water.Molecular ecology resources · 2026Pooled it
- Unlocking Demography: Developing an eDNA-Based Toolkit to Measure Sex Ratios From Populations.Molecular ecology resources · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis is a promising tool for the sensitive and effective monitoring of species distribution and abundance. Traditional eDNA analysis has targeted mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) fragments due to their abundance in cells; however, the quantification may vary depending on cell type and physiology. Conversely, some recent eDNA studies have targeted multi-copy nuclear DNA (nuDNA) fragments, such as ribosomal RNA genes, in water, and reported a higher detectability and more rapid degradation than mitochondrial eDNA (mt-eDNA). These properties suggest that nuclear eDNA (nu-eDNA) may be useful for the accurate estimation of species abundance relative to mt-eDNA, but which remains unclear. In this study, we compiled previous studies and re-analyzed the relationships between mt- and nu-eDNA concentration and species abundance by comparing the R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.