ReviewHead and neck pathology2022
Keratoameloblastoma: A Report of Seven New Cases and Review of Literature.
Review in Head and neck pathology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Keratoameloblastoma of the jaws and review of international literature of 38 cases.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2025Article
- Radiologic Specific Growth Rate of Ameloblastomas: A Clinicopathological Correlation.Journal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology · 2025Article
- Transformation of an odontogenic keratocyst into a solid variant of odontogenic keratocyst/keratoameloblastoma during long‑term follow‑up: A case report.Molecular medicine reports · 2024Article
- An Unusual Gingival (Peripheral) Tumor with Features of Keratoameloblastoma with Cytologic Atypia or Possible Malignant Transformation Exhibiting ARID1A Mutation.Head and neck pathology · 2023Article
- Solid variant of odontogenic keratocyst in a 22-year-old man: Report of a case.Clinical case reports · 2023Article
- Keratoameloblastoma of the lower jaw: A rare challenging entity.Dental research journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundKeratoameloblastoma (KA) is an uncommon and controversial variant of ameloblastoma exhibiting central keratinisation. Due to their rarity, there is limited information in the literature on their clinical, radiologic and histologic features. This study adds seven additional cases of KA to the literature, and reviews the current published literature on this rare entity.
methodsKAs were retrospectively reviewed over a 20-year period from three Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology Laboratories. Included cases were examined and the diagnosis confirmed under conventional microscopy. Immunohistochemistry with the use of a monoclonal antibody against calretinin was performed on included cases. The clinical, radiologic and histologic features of the seven new cases of KA were analysed and compared to existing cases in the literature.
resultsKAs presented at a mean age of 40 years with a nearly equal gender distribution and a mandibular predilection (65%). The majority (92%) of cases presented with localised swelling with associated pain in 32% of cases. Mixed density or internal calcifications were noted in 40% of cases. All tumours presented with bony expansion, with cortical destruction noted in 62% of cases. Histologically, all tumours consisted of solid and cystic follicles with surface parakeratinisation and lamellated accumulations of central keratin. In areas the cystic follicles had an epithelial lining suggestive of an OKC. There were focal luminal areas of loosely arranged polygonal cells reminiscent of the stellate reticulum. The basal cells consisted of columnar cells with evidence of palisading and prominent subnuclear vacuolisation. Of the cases treated via tumour resection, 27% presented with tumour recurrence.
conclusionThis case series reports seven additional cases of KA, taking the total to 26 reported cases. The identification of subtle histologic features, including focal stellate reticulum-like central areas, subnuclear vacuolisation and lamellated-type central keratinisation, are key in diagnosing KA. The radiologic features will often indicate signs of aggressiveness such as cortical destruction, differentiating KA from OKC. All cases were completely negative for calretinin IHC, limiting its use in distinguishing KA from OKC. Further large series are needed to expand the current understanding of this rare variant of ameloblastoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.