Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35861859›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2023

Regression rate of high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions in women younger than 25 years.

Anne Ehret, Victoria Naomi Bark, Anne Mondal, Tanja Natascha Fehm, Monika Hampl

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cytology in pregnancy.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anne EhretDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9178-7774
Victoria Naomi BarkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Anne MondalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Tanja Natascha FehmDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Monika HamplDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany. hampl@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
Düsseldorf University Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background/purposeThe incidence and clinical course of high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions (CIN 2/3) are age dependent. In CIN 3, the recommended treatment is conization, which increases the risk of cervical insufficiency or premature deliveries. But data concerning spontaneous regression of CIN 3 are rare.

methodsBetween 2007 and 2017, we identified 156 women under the age of 25 with CIN 2 (23%) or CIN 3 (77%), who had a consultation and were treated at the Colposcopy Unit, Hospital of Düsseldorf, Germany. This is a retrospective cohort study. These patients had colposcopical follow-ups every 4-6 months. Moreover, we analyzed various parameters to predict regression of cervical lesions in this age group.

resultsPatients diagnosed with CIN 2 showed regression in 88% (n = 30) and women with CIN 3 had a regression rate of 29% (n = 34). Complete regression was observed in 86.7% of CIN 2 and 47.1% of CIN3. Mean time to regression was 21 M (months) [2-70 M]. 70.9% of the patients were treated by surgery (LEEP) after persistence or progression. We identified several predictors for regression of CIN 2/3 in young women: the regression rate of CIN2 is significantly higher than CIN 3 (p < 0.001). Clearance of HPV infections had significantly higher rates of regression compared to persisting HPV infections (p < 0.001). HPV-vaccinated women showed significantly higher regression rates (p = 0.009).

conclusionsThese data show that an expectative close follow-up in women with CIN 3 younger than 25 is possible with regression rates of 29% also for CIN 3. Especially in women who were HPV vaccinated and those who cleared their HPV infection. A frequent colposcopical follow-up every 3-4 months is important for CIN 3 and every 6 months for CIN 2.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsColposcopyConizationFemaleGermanyHumansPregnancyRetrospective StudiesCIN 3ConizationRegression rateSpontaneous regression

Identifiers

PMID35861859
PMCPMC9984519
OpenAlexW4286496179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.