ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2022
Interventions in Adults With Repaired Coarctation of the Aorta.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk Factors for Reintervention Following Treatment for Aortic Coarctation With or Without Aortic Arch Hypoplasia in Sweden: From Isolated Coarctation to Complex Bi- and Univentricular Congenital Heart Disease.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Post-Coarctectomy Pseudoaneurysm with Recurrent Coarctation Treated with Open Surgery: A Comprehensive Literature Review and Case Report.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Application of fibrobronchoscopy-guided aortic suspension in pediatric patients with bronchial compression resulting from repair of coarctation of the aorta: a case report.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Article
- Ischemic Stroke in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: Cumulative Incidence and Associated Factors.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- Impaired Exercise Capacity and Mortality Risk in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease.JACC. Advances · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Coarctation of the aorta coexists with other cardiac anomalies and has long-term complications, including recoarctation, which may require intervention after the primary coarctation repair. This study aims to clarify the prevalence of and risk factors for interventions related to the coarctation complex as well as late mortality in a large contemporary patient population. Methods and Results The Swedish National Register of Congenital Heart Disease was used, which comprised 683 adults with repaired coarctation of the aorta. Analysis was performed on freedom from intervention thereafter at the coarctation site, aortic valve, left ventricular outflow tract, or ascending aorta. One hundred ninety-six (29%) patients had at least 1 of these interventions. Estimated freedom from either of these interventions was 60% after 50 years. The risk of undergoing such an intervention was higher among men (hazard ratio, 1.6 [95% CI, 1.2-2.2]). Estimated freedom from another intervention at the coarctation site was 75% after 50 years. In women, there was an increase in interventions at the coarctation site after 45 years. Patients who underwent one of the previously mentioned interventions after the primary coarctation repair had poorer left ventricular function. Eighteen patients (3%) died during follow-up in the register. The standardized mortality ratio was 2.9 (95% CI, 1.7-4.3). Conclusions Interventions are common after coarctation repair. The risk for and time of interventions are affected by sex. Our results have implications for planning follow-up and giving appropriate medical advice to the growing population of adults with repaired coarctation of the aorta.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.