Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35861687›Full record

ArticleEuropean eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association2022

A description of virtual skills workshops for supporters of loved ones with eating disorders: Indicators of benefit and acceptability, clinical reflections and consideration of neurodiversity.

Amy Harrison, Rebecca Folk, Faye Proud, Jessica Webb, Oyenike Oyeleye, Danielle Clark Bryan, Joyce Webb, Hannah Webb, Wendy Whitaker, Namrata Dhopatkar and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Parental perceptions of participation in young adult-focused eating disorder treatment.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Amy HarrisonAdult Eating Disorder Inpatient Service, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Tyson West 2, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Beckenham, UK.
Rebecca FolkEating Disorders Research Group, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Faye ProudEating Disorders Research Group, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Jessica WebbAdult Eating Disorder Inpatient Service, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Tyson West 2, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Beckenham, UK.
Oyenike OyeleyeAdult Eating Disorder Inpatient Service, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Tyson West 2, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Beckenham, UK.
Danielle Clark BryanEating Disorders Research Group, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Joyce WebbAdult Eating Disorder Inpatient Service, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Tyson West 2, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Beckenham, UK.
Hannah WebbAdult Eating Disorder Inpatient Service, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Tyson West 2, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Beckenham, UK.
Wendy WhitakerAdult Eating Disorder Inpatient Service, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Tyson West 2, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Beckenham, UK.
Namrata DhopatkarAdult Eating Disorder Inpatient Service, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Tyson West 2, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Beckenham, UK.
Janet TreasureEating Disorders Research Group, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveProviding information and support to those supporting a loved one with an eating disorder is a key part of evidence-based service provision. We report on how we took our workshops for supporters online during the Covid-19 Pandemic when country-side physical distancing restrictions meant we were unable to work face to face.

methodsWe outline the structure of an eight-session 2-h workshop series delivered fortnightly facilitated by a multidisciplinary team of clinicians, researchers and experts by experience. We use a repeated-measures design to understand the possible benefits of the workshops on supporter skills (n = 76).

resultsMeasured using the Caregiver Skills Scale, we observed small-sized improvements in the overall skills (D = 0.43) of n = 17 supporters who provided data at the end of the intervention. Supporters gave largely positive feedback on the virtual format. They particularly liked the opportunity to interact with other supporters. As facilitators, we overcome our initial anxiety around workshop delivery using a new platform and reflected that having more time to cover key information and for skills practice over a period of 16 weeks offered opportunities to develop and reflect on new skill together as a group. We were also able to work with larger groups of supporters, as several barriers to access were removed.

conclusionsAs the workshops reached a larger number of supporters than through face to face delivery and were of benefit to those who reported on their skills, we plan to continue offering workshops to supporters online in future.

Indexed as

COVID-19Feeding and Eating DisordersAnxietyCaregiversHumansPandemicsanorexia nervosabulimia nervosacarerseating disordersmotivational interviewingpsychoeducation

Identifiers

PMID35861687
PMCPMC9540464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.