ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2022
Delineating the Clinical Phenotype of Patients With the c.629C>G, p.Pro210Arg Mutation in Peripherin-2.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- PARP inhibition preserves cone photoreceptors in rd2 retina.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2025Article
- Article
- Downregulation of rhodopsin is an effective therapeutic strategy in ameliorating peripherin-2-associated inherited retinal disorders.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Comparative study of PRPH2 D2 loop mutants reveals divergent disease mechanism in rods and cones.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: More than 200 different mutations in peripherin-2 (PRPH2) are associated with multiple subtypes of inherited retinal diseases (IRDs), including retinitis pigmentosa and cone or macular diseases. Our goal was to understand how the poorly characterized PRPH2 mutation p.Pro210Arg (P210R) affects visual function and retinal structure as well as gain insight into the mechanism driving the clinical pathology. Methods: Eleven patients had clinical assessments including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), full field and multifocal electroretinography (ERG), static (spot size V) and kinetic perimetry (Octopus 900), and dark-adapted chromatic (DAC; Medmont; spot size V) perimetry. Images were acquired with the Optos ultra-wide field camera and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Molecular characteristics of the P210R mutant protein were evaluated in vitro. Results: Patients with the P210R mutation had BCVA (Snellen) ranging from 20/15 to 20/80. Perimetry showed a reduction in sensitivity, while ERG findings suggested that cone function was more impaired than rod function. Scotomas were identified corresponding to atrophic retinal lesions. Imaging revealed heterogeneous outer retinal changes such as hyperfluorescent flecks, hypo-autofluorescence (AF) regions of atrophy, and thinning of the photoreceptor layer on SD-OCT. In vitro findings suggested that P210R-Prph2 retains the ability to interact with binding partner Rom1 but abnormally accumulates in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), suggesting the protein does not fold properly. Conclusions: Rod and cone sensitivities were decreased in subjects with the P210R mutation in PRPH2. There was scotomatous vision loss that occurred within the macula, likely due to atrophy that occurs after drusen have formed and have begun to resolve. This suggests that although rod and cone photoreceptors are dependent on PRPH2, preventing blindness in this specific subgroup of patients could involve therapeutics that impede the formation or lifecycle of drusen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.