Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35861634›Full record

ArticleRisk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis2022

The social amplification of risk framework: New perspectives.

Roger E Kasperson, Thomas Webler, Bonnie Ram, Jeannette Sutton

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Risk Calibration: Divergent Interpretations of Risk Assessment in Norway's Early COVID-19 Response.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Survival First: How Citizens Prioritize Competing Climate-Health Risk Countermeasures Under Fiscal Constraints.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Municipal Risk Communication and Public Trust: Reducing Counterproductive Behaviors Across Emergency Scenarios.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2026
    Article
  7. Risk Perception and Communication, Plugged-In: Fifty Years of Process.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2026
    Article
  8. Who Talks About Flood Risks and Climate Change Adaptation? Analysis of Social Interactions in Three Countries.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Algorithm Perception When Using Threat Intelligence in Vulnerability Risk Assessment.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Political identity and risk politics: Evidence from a pandemic.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Conceptualizing social risk in relation to climate change and assisted ecosystem adaptation.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Roger E KaspersonGeography Department and George Perkins Marsh Institute, Clark University, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
Thomas WeblerSocial and Environmental Research Institute, Shelburne, Massachusetts, USA.
Bonnie RamCenter for Research in Wind, University of Delaware and Ram Power Consultancy, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Jeannette SuttonCollege of Emergency Preparedness, Homeland Security and Cybersecurity, University at Albany, SUNY.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several decades have elapsed since the introduction in 1988 of the social amplification of risk framework (SARF) by researchers from Clark University and Decision Research. SARF was offered as an umbrella under which social, psychological, and cultural theories of risk could be integrated and thereby supplement technical risk analyses. Some critics suggest that SARF cannot be tested thus, the framework is useful, at most, as a post hoc analysis of some kinds of risks. Others counter that predictability is not required for a framework to be useful and that SARF is an effective tool in organizing data related to public perceptions, values, and behaviors. It can also be used to design more effective risk communication and public engagement strategies. SARF also suggests how to conceptually view the dynamics of social media channels, despite the fact that SARF was developed before the explosion of global digital platforms. The papers in this special issue consider developments, refinements, critiques, contributions, extensions of the approach to new risk issues, as well as the findings and hypotheses that have grown out of what is now close to three decades of empirical research. This introductory paper provides background on SARF, presents a literature review since 2003, introduces the contributions to this issue, and highlights several areas for future research.

Indexed as

Social MediaHumansRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID35861634
PMCPMC10360138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.