Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35861529›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2022

Diagnostic Accuracy of the Truenat MTB Plus Assay and Comparison with the Xpert MTB/RIF Assay to Detect Tuberculosis among Hospital Outpatients in Cameroon.

Yannick Russel Ngangue, Cyrille Mbuli, Angela Neh, Emmanuel Nshom, Armand Koudjou, Dennis Palmer, Norah Nyah Ndi, Zhi Zhen Qin, Jacob Creswell, Vincent Mbassa and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Novel diagnostic test for the detection ofFrontiers in tuberculosis · 2025
    Article
  16. Infection and drug resistance · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Quantum Dot-Based Nanosensors for In Vitro Detection ofNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yannick Russel Ngangue *Center for Health Promotion and Research, Bamenda, Cameroon.ORCID 0000-0001-8017-9538
Cyrille Mbuli *Center for Health Promotion and Research, Bamenda, Cameroon.ORCID 0000-0001-9564-6311
Angela NehCenter for Health Promotion and Research, Bamenda, Cameroon.
Emmanuel NshomCameroon Baptist Convention Health Servicesgrid.463162.4, Bamenda, Cameroon.
Armand KoudjouCameroon Baptist Convention Health Servicesgrid.463162.4, Bamenda, Cameroon.
Dennis PalmerCameroon Baptist Convention Health Servicesgrid.463162.4, Bamenda, Cameroon.
Norah Nyah NdiCameroon Baptist Convention Health Servicesgrid.463162.4, Bamenda, Cameroon.
Zhi Zhen QinStop TB Partnership, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3956-5223
Jacob CreswellStop TB Partnership, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4885-940X
Vincent MbassaNational TB Program, Yaounde, Cameroon.
Comfort VuchasCenter for Health Promotion and Research, Bamenda, Cameroon.ORCID 0000-0001-7253-638X
Melissa SanderCenter for Health Promotion and Research, Bamenda, Cameroon.ORCID 0000-0002-1036-9376

Funding

Global Affairs Canada (GAC) CA-3-D000920001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Truenat MTB Plus assay is a rapid molecular test that has been recommended by the World Health Organization since 2020 as an initial test to detect tuberculosis (TB). The WHO highlighted the need to further evaluate assay performance to inform future recommendations, including in people living with HIV and compared to the Xpert MTB/RIF assay. We conducted a prospective evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of the Truenat assay in Cameroon, a country with a high burden of HIV/TB. Adult outpatients were recruited at four hospitals; demographic information and medical history were collected, and participants produced two sputum specimens. Truenat and Xpert testing was performed on the same specimen, and performance was compared to TB culture as the reference standard. From November 2019 to December 2020, 945 participants were enrolled and included in the analysis. Among 251 participants with culture-positive TB, the sensitivity of Truenat MTB Plus was 91% (95% confidence interval [CI], 86 to 94%), similar to Xpert (90%; 95% CI, 86 to 93%). Among 74 HIV-positive participants with culture-positive TB, the sensitivity of Truenat MTB Plus was 85% (95% CI, 75 to 92%) compared to 81% for Xpert (95% CI, 70 to 89%). Among 47 participants with smear-negative TB, the sensitivity of Truenat MTB Plus was 55% (95% CI, 40 to 70%), similar to Xpert (53%; 95% CI, 38 to 68%). The specificity of Truenat MTB Plus was 96% (95% CI, 94 to 97%) compared to 99% (95% CI, 97 to 99%) for Xpert. For TB detection compared to the reference standard of TB culture, the performance of the Truenat MTB Plus assay was similar to that of Xpert in this population, including among people living with HIV.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsMycobacterium tuberculosisTuberculosisTuberculosis, PulmonaryAdultCameroonDrug Resistance, BacterialHospitalsHumansOutpatientsRifampinSensitivity and SpecificitySputumRifampindiagnosticsmolecular methodsMycobacterium tuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID35861529
PMCPMC9383115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.