Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35861527›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2022

Discrimination of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Sublineages BA.1 and BA.2 Using a High-Resolution Melting-Based Assay: a Pilot Study.

Akira Aoki, Hirokazu Adachi, Yoko Mori, Miyabi Ito, Katsuhiko Sato, Kenji Okuda, Toru Sakakibara, Yoshinori Okamoto, Hideto Jinno

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Akira AokiFaculty of Pharmacy, Meijo Universitygrid.259879.8, Tempaku-ku, Nagoya, Japan.
Hirokazu AdachiAichi Prefectural Institute of Public Health, Nagoya, Japan.
Yoko MoriFaculty of Pharmacy, Meijo Universitygrid.259879.8, Tempaku-ku, Nagoya, Japan.
Miyabi ItoAichi Prefectural Institute of Public Health, Nagoya, Japan.
Katsuhiko SatoAichi Prefectural Institute of Public Health, Nagoya, Japan.
Kenji OkudaAichi Prefectural Institute of Public Health, Nagoya, Japan.
Toru SakakibaraAichi Prefectural Institute of Public Health, Nagoya, Japan.
Yoshinori OkamotoFaculty of Pharmacy, Meijo Universitygrid.259879.8, Tempaku-ku, Nagoya, Japan.
Hideto JinnoFaculty of Pharmacy, Meijo Universitygrid.259879.8, Tempaku-ku, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1810-4962
Aichi Prefectural Government · JPMeijo University · JPAichi Health Promotion Foundation · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Omicron variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has spread worldwide. As of March 2022, Omicron variant BA.2 is rapidly replacing variant BA.1. As variant BA.2 may cause more severe disease than variant BA.1, variant BA.2 requires continuous monitoring. The current study aimed to develop a novel high-resolution melting (HRM) assay for variants BA.1 and BA.2 and to determine the sensitivity and specificity of our method using clinical samples. Here, we focused on the mutational spectra at three regions in the spike receptor-binding domain (RBD; R408, G446/L452, and S477/T478) for the variant-selective HRM analysis. Each variant was identified based on the mutational spectra as follows: no mutations (Alpha variant); L452R and T478K (Delta variant); G446S and S477N/T478K (Omicron variant BA.1); and R408S and S477N/T478K (Omicron variant BA.2). Upon analysis of mutation-coding RNA fragments, the melting curves of the wild-type fragments were distinct from those of the mutant fragments. The sensitivity and specificity of this method were determined as 100% and more than 97.5%, respectively, based on 128 clinical samples (40 Alpha, 40 Delta, 40 Omicron variant BA.1/BA.1.1, and 8 Omicron variant BA.2). These results suggest that this HRM-based assay is a promising screening method for monitoring the transmission of Omicron variants BA.1 and BA.2.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2FreezingHumansPilot ProjectsBA.1BA.2high-resolution meltingOmicron variantreceptor-binding domainSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35861527
PMCPMC9430517
OpenAlexW4286492480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.