Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35861337›Full record

ArticleJournal of addiction medicine

Perspectives of Patients Receiving Telemedicine Services for Opioid Use Disorder Treatment: A Qualitative Analysis of User Experiences.

Jessica L Sousa, Pushpa Raja, Haiden A Huskamp, Ateev Mehrotra, Alisa B Busch, Michael L Barnett, Lori Uscher-Pines

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of addiction medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Comparison of buprenorphine treatment by virtual-only vs. traditional clinicians.Journal of substance use and addiction treatment · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Telemedicine-Related Opioid Use Disorder Services in Underserved Populations: A Qualitative Evaluation of the Waiver Era.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jessica L SousaFrom the RAND Corporation, Boston, MA (JLS); Greater Los Angeles VA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (PR); Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (HAH, AM, ABB); Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA (AM); McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA (ABB); Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (MLB); RAND Corporation, Arlington, VA (LU-P).
Pushpa Raja
Haiden A Huskamp
Ateev Mehrotra
Alisa B Busch
Michael L Barnett
Lori Uscher-Pines

Funding

Telemedicine for Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder: NIDA Summer Research Internship ProgramR01DA048533 · NIDA · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI Haiden A Huskamp, Ateev Mehrotra · 2019 to 2026
$5.6M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA048533
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTelemedicine for opioid use disorder (tele-OUD) has the potential to increase access to medications for OUD (MOUD). Fully virtual tele-OUD services, in which all care is provided via telemedicine, are increasingly common, yet few studies document the experiences of patients who use such services. Understanding patient perspectives is one of multiple considerations to inform the regulation and reimbursement of tele-OUD services.

methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 adults receiving care from one fully virtual tele-OUD service who had received 3 to 5 weeks of treatment. Analyses were conducted using an inductive and deductive approach informed by the modified Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model.

resultsOver three quarters of patients with past experience receiving in-person MOUD treatment described tele-OUD as more advantageous with its key strength being more patient centered. Over three quarters of patients said they felt tele-OUD helped to ameliorate social barriers to seeking treatment, and nearly all said they appreciated the speed at which they were able to initiate MOUD treatment via tele-OUD. Surprisingly, the pandemic was not among the factors that influenced patient interest in tele-OUD.

conclusionsPatients engaged in one fully virtual tele-OUD service described unique advantages of tele-OUD. More research is needed to determine the appropriateness of tele-OUD for people in various stages of recovery, and data on long-term treatment outcomes are needed to inform decisions regarding the regulation and reimbursement of fully virtual and hybrid care models for OUD.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineOpioid-Related DisordersTelemedicineAdultAnalgesics, OpioidHumansOpiate Substitution TreatmentPandemicsAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphine

Identifiers

PMID35861337
PMCPMC10075257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.