ArticleLab on a chip2022
Rapid nucleic acid extraction from skin biopsies using a point-of-care device.
Article in Lab on a chip, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integration of Point-of-Care Technology in the Decoding Process of Single Nucleotide Polymorphism for Healthcare ApplicationMicromachines · 2025Review
- Skin biopsy processing for rapid molecular diagnosis and histopathologic interpretation: application to Kaposi sarcoma in East Africa.Infectious agents and cancer · 2025Article
- Rapid, equipment-free extraction of DNA from skin biopsies for point-of-care diagnostics.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Development of a nucleic acid-based lateral flow device as a reliable diagnostic tool for respiratory viral infections.MethodsX · 2023Article
- LAMP-enabled diagnosis of Kaposi's sarcoma for sub-Saharan Africa.Science advances · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Sample processing is often the rate-limiting step for point-of-care nucleic acid testing, especially for large, robust tissues such as skin biopsies, which can be used to diagnose a variety of dermatological diseases. Extraction of nucleic acids from these samples often relies on lengthy enzymatic digestions, increasing the time to result and reducing the potential impact of rapid molecular diagnostic approaches. To address this, we have developed BLENDER, a device for rapid nucleic acid extraction from tissue biopsies that combines bead-beating homogenization with simultaneous sample heating for enzymatic lysis. Our device can produce a complete DNA yield from a 3 mm cylindrical skin biopsy with only a 15 minute extraction compared to 4 hours when using a commercially available extraction protocol. Decreasing sample-processing time for tissue biopsies could reduce time-to-result for downstream analysis, enabling faster point-of-care diagnosis of solid cancers in limited resource settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.