Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35861102›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2022

Early evaluation of a next-generation surgical system in robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy: A prospective clinical cohort study.

Mahindra Borse, Girish Godbole, Dhananjay Kelkar, Madhavi Bahulikar, Eoin Dinneen, Mark Slack

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Robotic-assisted hysterectomy using DEXTERFacts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mahindra BorseDeenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Center, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Girish GodboleDeenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Center, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Dhananjay KelkarDeenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Center, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Madhavi BahulikarDeenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Center, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Eoin DinneenDivision of Surgical and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Mark SlackCMR Surgical, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2176-8118
Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Center · INCMR Surgical (United Kingdom) · GBWellcome / EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study aimed to demonstrate the safe and effective use of the Versius surgical system (CMR Surgical, Cambridge, UK) in robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy. This surgical robot was developed iteratively with input from surgeons to improve surgical outcomes and end-user experience. We report data from the gynecology cohort of an early clinical trial designed in broad alignment with IDEAL-D (Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, Long-term follow-up - Devices) stage 2b (Exploration). MATERIAL AND

methodsThe study is registered in the Indian clinical trials register (CTRI/2019/02/017872). Adult women requiring total hysterectomy who provided informed consent and met the eligibility criteria underwent procedures at one of three hospitals in India. Five surgeons performed robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomies using the device from March 2019 to September 2020. The primary endpoint was rate of unplanned conversion to conventional laparoscopic or open surgery. Adverse events were adjudicated by an independent clinical events committee using endoscope video recordings and clinical notes.

resultsIn total, 144 women underwent surgery (median age: 44 years [range: 28-78]; median body mass index 25.8 kg/m

conclusionsThe device provides a safe and effective option for total laparoscopic hysterectomy; these findings support its continued implementation in larger patient cohorts and expansion in other major minimal access indications.

Indexed as

HysterectomyLaparoscopyRobotic Surgical ProceduresAdultAgedClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMiddle AgedProspective Studiesclinical trialgynecologyminimal access surgeryrobot-assisted surgeryrobotic surgical systemsurgical robot

Identifiers

PMID35861102
PMCPMC9564672
OpenAlexW4286007652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.