ArticleHeadache2022
Comparison and predictors of chronic migraine vs. new daily persistent headache presenting with a chronic migraine phenotype.
Article in Headache, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Osmophobia in Patients With Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2025Review
- Tracking Migraine Symptoms: A Longitudinal Comparison of Smartphone-Based Headache Diaries and Clinical Interviews.Neurology international · 2025Article
- New Daily Persistent Headache in the Pediatric and Adolescent Population: An Updated Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Phenotype of new daily persistent headache: subtypes and comparison to transformed chronic daily headache.The journal of headache and pain · 2023Article
- Comparison and predictors of chronic migraine vs. new daily persistent headache presenting with a chronic migraine phenotype.Headache · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the clinical phenotype of patients with chronic migraine (CM) to patients with new daily persistent headache of the chronic migraine subtype (NDPH-CM).
methodsA study was conducted of CM (n = 257) and NDPH-CM (n = 76) from a tertiary headache center in the UK, and in the US of patients with daily CM (n = 60) and NDPH-CM (n = 22).
resultsFrom the UK cohort, the age of first headache onset was lower in CM (mean ± SD: 16 ± 12 years) than in NDPH-CM (mean ± SD: 23 ± 14 years; p < 0.001). There was a greater number of associated migrainous symptoms in CM compared to NDPH-CM (median and interquartile range: 6, 5-8 vs. 5, 4-7; p < 0.001). A family history of headache was more common in CM compared to NDPH-CM (82%, 202/248, vs. 53%, 31/59; p < 0.001). In the US cohort there were no differences. Osmophobia (B = -1.08; p = 0.002) and older age at presentation to the clinic (B = -0.06; p = 0.001) were negative predictors of NDPH-CM.
conclusionNDPH-CM is relatively less migrainous than CM in the UK cohort. Family history of headache is less common in NDPH-CM, with negative predictors for NDPH-CM including osmophobia and older age of presentation to the clinic. More work is required to understand the chronic migraine phenotype of new daily persistent headache.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.