Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35860836›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2022

Association of proton pump inhibitor use with survival outcomes in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Baoqing Chen, Chen Yang, Mihnea P Dragomir, Dongmei Chi, Wenyan Chen, David Horst, George A Calin, Qiaoqiao Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. The Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Journey: From Early Promise to Lasting Impact.Journal of immunotherapy and precision oncology · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Baoqing ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Chen YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7593-5316
Mihnea P DragomirInstitute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
Dongmei ChiDepartment of Anesthesiology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Wenyan ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
David HorstInstitute of Pathology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
George A CalinTranslational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Qiaoqiao LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, No. 651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou 510060, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6299-4966
Sun Yat-sen University · CNGerman Cancer Research Center · DEThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been shown to regulate the gut microbiome and affect the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Contradictory results on survival have been observed in patients concomitantly treated with ICIs and PPIs. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the association between PPI use and survival outcomes in ICI-treated cancer patients. Methods: EMBASE, MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library databases, and major oncology conference proceedings were searched. Studies comparing overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between PPI-treated and PPI-free groups of ICI-treated cancer patients were included. Data regarding study and patient characteristics, ICI and PPI treatments, and survival outcomes were extracted. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled using random effects models. Subgroup meta-analyses and meta-regressions were performed to explore possible factors of heterogeneity among the studies. Results: A total of 33 studies were included, comprising 7383 ICI- and PPI-treated patients and 8574 ICI-treated and PPI-free patients. The pooled HR was 1.31 (95% CI, 1.19-1.44; Conclusions: PPI use in patients treated with ICIs was associated with shorter OS and PFS, especially in several specific subgroups of cancer patients. PPIs should be strictly controlled and appear to not impact survival if given temporarily after ICI initiation. These observations could provide the basis for clinical guidelines for concomitant PPI and ICI use.

Indexed as

cancerimmune checkpoint inhibitorsmeta-analysisproton pump inhibitorsurvival

Identifiers

PMID35860836
PMCPMC9290095
OpenAlexW4285611072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.