Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35860752›Full record

ArticleResuscitation plus2022

Hemodynamics and vasopressor support during targeted temperature management after cardiac arrest with non-shockable rhythm: A post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

Matthieu Petit, Jean-Baptiste Lascarrou, Gwenhael Colin, Hamid Merdji, Alain Cariou, Guillaume Geri, HYPERION investigators

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Resuscitation plus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01994772 (Therapeutic Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest in Non Shockable Rhythm at Rescue Arrival), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01994772 nacompletednot on this map

Therapeutic Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest in Non Shockable Rhythm at Rescue Arrival: The HYPERION Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Departemental VendeeRan2014 to 2018Enrolled584ConditionsCardiac ArrestArmsTargeted controlled temperature between 32.5 and 33.5°C, Targeted controlled temperature between 36.5 and 37.5°C
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Matthieu PetitMedical Intensive Care Unit, Ambroise Paré Hospital, APHP, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Jean-Baptiste LascarrouMédecine Intensive Réanimation, University Hospital Center, Nantes, France.
Gwenhael ColinMedical-Surgical Intensive Care Unit, District Hospital Center, La Roche-sur-Yon, France.
Hamid MerdjiUniversité de Strasbourg (UNISTRA), Faculté de Médecine, Hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Strasbourg, France.
Alain CariouParis Cardiovascular Research Center, INSERM U970, Paris, France.
Guillaume GeriMedical and Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Ambroise Paré Clinic, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France.
HYPERION investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patients admitted after cardiac arrest with non-shockable rhythm frequently experience hemodynamic instability. This study assessed the hemodynamic consequences of TTM in this sub population. Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of the HYPERION trial (NCT01994772), that randomized patients to either hypothermia or normothermia after non-shockable rhythm related cardiac arrest. Patients with no, moderate or severe circulatory failure were identified with cardiovascular Sequential Organ Failure Assessment at randomization. Primary outcome was the number of patients at day 7 with resolution of shock, accounting for the risk of death (competing risk analysis). Secondary endpoint included neurological outcome and death at day-90. Results: 584 patients were included in the analysis: 195 (34%), 46 (8%) and 340 (59%) had no, moderate and severe circulatory failure, respectively. Resolution of circulatory failure at day 7 was more frequently observed in the normothermia group than in the TTM group (60% [95 %CI 54-66] versus 53% [95 %CI 46-60], Gray-test: p = 0.016). The severity of circulatory failure at randomization was associated with its less frequent resolution at day 7 accounting for the risk of death (76 % [62-86] versus 54% [49-59] for patients with moderate versus severe circulatory failure, Gray test, p < 0.001, respectively). At day 90, the proportion of patients with Cerebral Performance Category score of 1 or 2 was lower in patients presenting severe circulatory failure (p = 0.038). Conclusion: Circulatory failure is frequent after CA with non-shockable rhythm. Its severity at admission and TTM were associated with delayed resolution of circulatory failure.

Indexed as

Cardiac arrestCirculatory failurePost resuscitation shockTargeted temperature management

Identifiers

PMID35860752
PMCPMC9289859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.