ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022
Serodiagnosis of Anti-glomerular Basement Membrane Disease Using a Newly Developed Chemiluminescence Immunoassay.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anti-GBM antibody in a patient with diabetic nephropathy; all that glitters is not gold.Journal of nephrology · 2024Article
- New Biomarkers for Systemic Necrotizing Vasculitides.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Circulating autoantibodies directed against the kidney glomerular basement membrane (GBM) antigens are important markers in the diagnosis and monitoring of autoimmune glomerulonephritides, including the classic Goodpasture's syndrome. Rapid and reliable diagnostic tools for the detection of anti-GBM autoantibodies are crucial as anti-GBM disease can progress rapidly and, if too late or incorrectly diagnosed, can have serious, even fatal consequences. The performance of the newly developed standardized chemiluminescence immunoassay (ChLIA) was evaluated in comparison with the established Anti-GBM ELISA (IgG) (EUROIMMUN). For the assessment of its diagnostic performance, sera from 67 clinically characterized anti-GBM disease patients and 221 disease controls were analyzed. The clinical sensitivity of the Anti-GBM ChLIA (IgG) reached 100% at a specificity of 98.6%. The Anti-GBM ELISA (IgG) performance was less sensitive (89.6%) without any positive findings in the control group, indicating a specificity of 100%. Both methods were homogeneous (κ = 0.901). The Anti-GBM ChLIA (IgG) represents a promising alternative tool for accurate anti-GBM assessment in routine diagnostic settings with the advantage of rapid turnaround time and fully automated random-access processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.