Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35860735›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2022

Do Relapses Follow ANCA Rises? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Value of Serial ANCA Level Evaluation.

Aram Al-Soudi, Yosta Vegting, Paul L Klarenbeek, Marc L Hilhorst

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Understanding the burden of ANCA-associated vasculitis.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Top ten tips in managing ANCA vasculitis.Clinical kidney journal · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aram Al-SoudiDepartment of Rheumatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Yosta VegtingDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Nephrology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Paul L KlarenbeekDepartment of Rheumatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Marc L HilhorstDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Nephrology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: ANCA-vasculitis (AAV) patients frequently suffer from relapses and risk subsequent organ damage. There is much debate on the value of serial ANCA level evaluation to monitor disease activity. We aimed to evaluate the association between ANCA rises and disease relapses at (I) moment of the rise, (II) within 6 months or (III) within a year from the rise. Methods: 3 databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, COCHRANE) were searched from 1993 through September 2021. We included studies that reported relapse incidence within 12 months after an ANCA rise measured by antigen-specific immunoassays in peripheral blood of AAV patients in remission. Quality assessment was performed using QUADAS-2. Finally, a meta-analysis was carried out to estimate average OR using a random effects model. Results: Twenty unique studies were included. The methodological quality was limited due to risk of selection bias. An ANCA rise often preceded a disease relapse within 6 months (OR 3.65, 95% CI 1.66-8.03) and less often within 12 months (OR 2.88, 95% CI 1.21-6.88), while it was not indicative of a concurrent relapse (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.03-0.53). Once a relapse is diagnosed, ANCA is significantly more often present than not (OR 10.80, 95% CI 3.82-30.55). As expected based on clinical, technical and methodological variability between studies, there was substantial heterogeneity across studies in all analyses (I2 = 70-87%). Conclusion: In previously ANCA-positive patients, the ANCA test is often positive upon clinical suspicion of a disease relapse. Patients with a rise in ANCA are at risk of encountering disease relapses in the upcoming 6 or 12 months.

Indexed as

ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV)anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA)biomarker (BM)flarerelapse

Identifiers

PMID35860735
PMCPMC9289208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.