Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35860721›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of midwifery2022

A meta-ethnography of language challenges in midwifery care.

Victoria L Sellevold, Lene L Hamre, Terese E Bondas

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of midwifery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Victoria L SellevoldFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
Lene L HamreFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
Terese E BondasChildbearing - Qualitative Research Network, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
University of Stavanger · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe aim was to synthesize qualitative studies that shed light on immigrant women's own experiences regarding language challenges during pregnancy, birth and the postpartum period in a new country. Wikberg's theory of intercultural caring was chosen as the theoretical perspective.

methodsThis meta-ethnography was conducted in accordance with Noblit and Hare, an interpretative qualitative review approach in seven phases, based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, and a systematic and manual search yielding a total of 1253 articles. Seven articles were included after a quality appraisal using the CASP instrument, and the process is shown in a PRISMA chart. The 142 women from the studies represented 42 different nationalities and were residents in 6 different host countries.

resultsA synthesis model illuminates the immigrant women's experiences of language challenges. 'To comprehend and to be understood as a unique person' emerged as the overarching theme, based on the three analogous themes: 'a desire to be met with respectful understanding', 'ethical and accurate interpreting', and 'caring midwives and new relationships'. The fourth opposite theme, 'violations and feelings of inferiority' describes the immigrant women's experiences when the language challenges remained.

conclusionsMidwives should be aware of language challenges in pregnancy, birth and postpartum care to minimize the risk of violations and unnecessary suffering related to care. The synthesis model can serve as a guide for respectful understanding, ethical and accurate interpreting, and caring, in accordance with Wikberg's dimensions of intercultural caring: universality, context, culture, and the needs and wishes of the immigrant women.

Indexed as

communicationforeign womenimmigrationlanguagemeta-ethnographyqualitative review

Identifiers

PMID35860721
PMCPMC9254263
OpenAlexW4283816904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.