ArticleProgress in rehabilitation medicine2022
Immediate Effects of Electrical Stimulation on Oropharyngeal Structure and Laryngeal Vestibular Closure: A Pilot Study in Healthy Subjects.
Article in Progress in rehabilitation medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electrical Stimulation for Treatment of Dysphagia Post Head Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International archives of otorhinolaryngology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study examined the immediate effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on the dynamics of oropharyngeal structure and laryngeal vestibular closure (LVC) in healthy subjects. Methods: Ten healthy male volunteers participated in this controlled, before-and-after, videofluoroscopic swallowing pilot study. The study was conducted in four phases (each performed twice): (1) saliva swallow (SS) before evaluation (BEFORE), (2) NMES while at rest with no SS (NMES AT REST), (3) SS during NMES (DURING NMES), and (4) SS to examine the aftereffects of NMES (AFTER). We measured distances that oropharyngeal structures moved in the NMES AT REST phase, and we analyzed the kinematics of saliva swallowing primarily in the BEFORE and AFTER phases. Results: Four changes in the morphology of the oropharyngeal structure caused by NMES AT REST were statistically significant: anterior-upward displacement of the hyoid bone and larynx, stretch of the laryngeal vestibule, and posterior ridge of the tongue root. Regarding the kinematics measured during SS, although there was no significant change in LVC reaction times, LVC duration in the AFTER phase was significantly longer than BEFORE. Regarding maximal displacement of the hyoid bone, there was significantly greater movement AFTER than BEFORE. As additional exploratory outcomes, the velocity of hyoid bone movement was significantly slower, and the hyoid-to-larynx approximation was significantly smaller, DURING NMES than AFTER. Conclusions: Longer duration of LVC might be caused by adaptive learning with NMES-induced structural changes in the oropharynx. Further clinical studies are warranted to determine whether this approach improves dysphagia, which impairs LVC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.