Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35860493›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022

Predicting 30-Day Readmission for Stroke Using Machine Learning Algorithms: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Yu-Ching Chen, Jo-Hsuan Chung, Yu-Jo Yeh, Shi-Jer Lou, Hsiu-Fen Lin, Ching-Huang Lin, Hong-Hsi Hsien, Kuo-Wei Hung, Shu-Chuan Jennifer Yeh, Hon-Yi Shi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Yu-Ching ChenDepartment of Healthcare Administration and Medical Informatics, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Jo-Hsuan ChungDepartment of Healthcare Administration and Medical Informatics, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Yu-Jo YehDepartment of Healthcare Administration and Medical Informatics, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Shi-Jer LouDepartment of Healthcare Administration and Medical Informatics, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Hsiu-Fen LinDepartment of Neurology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Ching-Huang LinDivision of Neurology, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Hong-Hsi HsienDepartment of Internal Medicine, St. Joseph Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Kuo-Wei HungDivision of Neurology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yuan's General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Shu-Chuan Jennifer YehDepartment of Healthcare Administration and Medical Informatics, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Hon-Yi ShiDepartment of Healthcare Administration and Medical Informatics, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Kaohsiung Medical University · TWMinistry of Health and Welfare · TWKaohsiung Veterans General Hospital · TWNational Cheng Kung University · TWSt. Joseph Hospital · USYuan's General Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Machine learning algorithms for predicting 30-day stroke readmission are rarely discussed. The aims of this study were to identify significant predictors of 30-day readmission after stroke and to compare prediction accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve in five models: artificial neural network (ANN), K nearest neighbor (KNN), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), naive Bayes classifier (NBC), and Cox regression (COX) models. Methods: The subjects of this prospective cohort study were 1,476 patients with a history of admission for stroke to one of six hospitals between March, 2014, and September, 2019. A training dataset ( Results: For predicting 30-day readmission after stroke, the ANN model had significantly ( Conclusion: Using a machine-learning ANN model to obtain an accurate estimate of 30-day readmission for stroke and to identify risk factors may improve the precision and efficacy of management for these patients. For stroke patients who are candidates for PAC rehabilitation, these predictors have practical applications in educating patients in the expected course of recovery and health outcomes.

Indexed as

30-day readmissionartificial neural networkfeature importance analysispost-acute carestroke

Identifiers

PMID35860493
PMCPMC9289395
OpenAlexW4283800225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.