Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35860418›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain research2022

Interspinous Process Devices Do Not Reduce Intervertebral Foramina and Discs Heights on Adjacent Segments.

Mateusz Krakowiak, Natalia Rulewska, Marcin Rudaś, Maciej Broda, Michał Sabramowicz, Andrzej Jaremko, Krzysztof Leki, Paweł Sokal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Evaluating 5-year outcomes of interlaminar devices as an adjunct to decompression for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mateusz KrakowiakDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurology, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Natalia RulewskaStudents' Scientific Circle at the Department of Neurosurgery, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Marcin RudaśDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurology, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Maciej BrodaDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurology, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Michał SabramowiczDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurology, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Andrzej JaremkoDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurology, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0668-2028
Krzysztof LekiCentre for Statistical Analysis, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1627-1326
Paweł SokalDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurology, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1226-1983
Nicolaus Copernicus University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Interspinous process device (IPD) placement is an attractive treatment option for lumbar spinal and foraminal stenosis. The goal of the treatment is to release the stress on facets joints as well as decompress the nerve roots by enlarging the intervertebral foramina and narrowed canal recesses. Purpose: To evaluate possible structural changes in the lumbar spine after implantation of an IPD on operated and adjacent segments. Patients and Methods: Twenty-two patients were enrolled in the study. Preoperative MRI scans of the lumbar spine evaluated recess and foraminal stenosis prior to the application of an IPD. CT exams were performed and morphometric measurements were made to assess the size of intervertebral foramina after implantation on the operated and adjacent segments. Results: Statistically significant enlargements in diameter and surface area of the intervertebral foramen were seen at the operating level. On the right and left sides, foraminal enlargement after the procedure was 1 mm in diameter. The average enlargement of the foramina surface area at the level of implantation was 10 mm Conclusion: Decompression surgery using an IPD is effective in the treatment of lumbar foraminal and canal stenosis. It provides relief of symptoms in short-term observation through enlargement of intervertebral foramina and decompression of neural roots. It reduces overload of facet joints of the operated segment and does not decrease the size of the intervertebral foramina and disc heights of adjacent segments.

Indexed as

foraminal stenosisinterspinous devicelow lumbar back painlumbar decompressionspinal canal stenosis

Identifiers

PMID35860418
PMCPMC9292060
OpenAlexW4285405167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.