ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2022
Evaluating statistical significance in a
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- A conserved regulatory architecture stabilizes cellular senescence across distinct triggers in human fibroblasts.GeroScience · 2026Article
- SMART 2.0 Statistical Metabolomics Analysis: An R Tool 2.0.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
- The therapeutic benefit of antioxidants on the outcome of acute aluminum phosphide poisoning: a systemic review and meta-analysis.Toxicology research · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Meta-analysis is a method for enhancing statistical power through the integration of information from multiple studies. Various methods for integrating p-values (i.e., statistical significance), including Fisher's method under an independence assumption, the permutation method, and the decorrelation method, have been broadly used in bioinformatics and computational biotechnology studies. However, these methods have limitations related to statistical assumption, computing efficiency, and accuracy of statistical significance estimation. In this study, we proposed a numerical integration method and examined its theoretical properties. Simulation studies were conducted to evaluate its Type I error, statistical power, computational efficiency, and estimation accuracy, and the results were compared with those of other methods. The results demonstrate that our proposed method performs well in terms of Type I error, statistical power, computing efficiency (regardless of sample size), and statistical significance estimation accuracy. P-value data from multiple large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWASs) and transcriptome-wise association studies (TWASs) were analyzed. The results demonstrate that our proposed method can be used to identify critical genomic regions associated with rheumatoid arthritis and asthma, increase statistical significance in individual GWASs and TWASs, and control for false-positives more effectively than can Fisher's method under an independence assumption. We created the software package Pbine, available at GitHub (https://github.com/Yinchun-Lin/Pbine).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.