ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Mechanistic Crosstalk between Probiotics, ncRNAs, and Autophagy: Implications for Colorectal Cancer Precision Medicine.Expert reviews in molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Gut microecology empowers cancer immunotherapy: commensal microbiota-mediated mechanisms and translational prospects of PD-1/PD-L1 therapy.Cancer biology & medicine · 2026Review
- Gerobiotics: Exploring the Potential and Limitations of Repurposing Probiotics in Addressing Aging Hallmarks and Chronic Diseases.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
- There may be a differential mechanistic impact on colorectal cancer of lactose-containing foods between lactase persistent and lactase non-persistent populations.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Identification of Key Features Pivotal to the Characteristics and Functions of Gut Bacteria Taxa through Machine Learning Methods.Current gene therapy · 2025Article
- Review
- The postbiotic of hawthorn-probiotic ameliorates constipation by multi-pathway inhibition of PANoptosis in intestinal epithelial cells.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Intestinal flora and inflammatory bowel disease: Causal relationships and predictive models.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Human recombinant soluble PD1 can interference in T cells and Treg cells function in response to MDA-MB-231 cancer cell line.American journal of clinical and experimental immunology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Our objective was to investigate whether Bifidobacterium infantis inhibits PI3K-Akt-mTOR signaling and upregulates Foxp3 expression through PD-L1 and to explore the possible mechanism of action of B. infantis in cellular immunosuppression. Method: The effects of B. infantis supernatant on PD-L1, PD-1, Foxp3, and the PI3K-Akt-mTOR signaling pathway were observed by culturing HCT-116 cells. Simultaneously, the effects of blocking PD-L1 on PD-1, on Foxp3 protein and mRNA, and on the PI3K-Akt-mTOR signaling pathway protein were observed. Results: B. infantis supernatant was able to upregulate the protein and mRNA expression of PD-L1 and Foxp3 and downregulate the phosphorylated protein expression of PI3K, Akt, and mTOR (P < 0.05); however, for PI3K, Akt, and mTOR, there was no change in the total protein expression. After the blocking of PD-L1, the stimulatory effect of B. infantis supernatant on Foxp3 and the inhibitory effect on the phosphorylated protein expression of PI3K, Akt, and mTOR were weakened. Conclusion: B. infantis may inhibit the PI3K-Akt-mTOR signaling pathway and promote the expression of Foxp3 through PD-L1, which may be a target
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.