Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35860186›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022

The Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Tarsal Sinus Approach and L-Type Incision Approach Combined with 3D Printing Technology in Calcaneal Fracture.

Hao Du, Shiang Li, Shicheng Tu, Kun Wang, Zhiyu Fang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hao DuThe First Affiliated Hospital, and College of Clinical Medicine of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China 471003.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6939-3610
Shiang LiThe First Affiliated Hospital, and College of Clinical Medicine of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China 471003.
Shicheng TuThe First Affiliated Hospital, and College of Clinical Medicine of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China 471003.
Kun WangThe First Affiliated Hospital, and College of Clinical Medicine of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China 471003.
Zhiyu FangThe First Affiliated Hospital, and College of Clinical Medicine of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China 471003.
First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the comparison of the reduction of the subtalar articular surface and other postoperative effects of the minimally invasive tarsal sinus approach and lateral L-shaped incision conventional approach for the treatment of calcaneal fracture with 3D printing technology. Methods: Patients who received surgical treatment for calcaneal fractures in the First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology from June 2019 to December 2020 were collected. 3D printing equipment produced the affected side reduction heel bone fracture model and navigation template model. The tarsal sinus approach was used in the experimental group, and the lateral L-shaped incision approach was used in the control group. Patients were followed up 3 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after the operation. Imaging indicators were measured 12 months after surgery, and scores from American Foot and Ankle Orthopaedic Society (AOFAS) and MSF were performed. Results: Operation time was 70.52 ± 13.16 in the control group and 55.24 ± 12.25 minutes in the experimental group ( Conclusion: The study found that the experimental group was significantly better than the control group in terms of the operation time, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, and success rate of reduction of the subtalar articular surface. 3D printing technology can shorten the operation time, accurately reduce the fracture block, and reduce the secondary trauma, which is conducive to the functional recovery of the affected foot.

Indexed as

Ankle InjuriesCalcaneusFractures, BoneKnee InjuriesFracture Fixation, InternalHeelHumansPrinting, Three-DimensionalTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID35860186
PMCPMC9293505
OpenAlexW4285042483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.