ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022
Research Value of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in Alleviating Parotid Gland Function Injury in Patients with Stage N0 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma from Physical and Dosimetric Aspects.
Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictive value of delta radiomics in xerostomia after chemoradiotherapy in patients with stage III-IV nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2024Article
- Retracted: Research Value of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in Alleviating Parotid Gland Function Injury in Patients with Stage N0 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma from Physical and Dosimetric Aspects.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-06-28Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Human Subject Welfare · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To study the feasibility of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for stage N Methods: All the clinical data of 77 patients with pathologically confirmed T Results: Higher minimal, maximal, and average irradiation doses of PG were determined in 3D-CRT-treated patients compared with IMRT-treated cases ( Conclusion: IMRT has similar short-term efficacy to 3D-CRT in treating patients with stage N
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.