Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35860178›Full record

ArticleJournal of European CME2022

Report on Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual European CME Forum, Studio Hybrid from Manchester UK, November, 2021.

Ron Murray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of European CME, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ron MurrayIndependent CME/CPD Consultant, Pickering, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a departure from the increasingly familiar virtual meetings conducted via collaboration apps the Fourteenth Annual European CME Forum (#14ECF) took place between 3 and 5 November 2021 using a blended model that relied mainly on a studio-based hub. A small group of faculty hosted plenary sessions in the studio with participation by attendees, panellists and workshop leaders via an interactive online meeting platform. The theme of the meeting was "The 3-legged stool: Achieving balance for effective CME. The plenaries focused on three linked topics, Rules and Regulations, Educational Design and Outcomes, and Funding and Independence. These were broadcast in high definition whilst interaction among participants, workshop leaders, and poster authors was achieved using an avatar-based conferencing platform. The breakout workshops covered topics including digital literacy, international collaboration, artificial intelligence, and diversity and inclusion. The meeting format was well accepted by participants and will form the basis for more hybrid-type meetings for future meetings.

Indexed as

accreditationchangeCMEcollaborationContinuing medical educationCPDdigitisationhybridoutcomes

Identifiers

PMID35860178
PMCPMC9291652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.