Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35860173›Full record

ArticleDialogues in clinical neuroscience2021

Chemical sex (chemsex) in a population of French university students.

L Malandain, S Mosser, S Mouchabac, J-V Blanc, C Alexandre, F Thibaut

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dialogues in clinical neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Translational chasm and dialogues in clinical neuroscience.Dialogues in clinical neuroscience · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

L MalandainUniversity Hospital Cochin (site Tarnier), Paris University, AP-HP, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3888-7690
S MosserHopital Saint-Antoine, Adult Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3543-4496
S MouchabacHopital Saint-Antoine, Adult Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Paris, France.
J-V BlancHopital Saint-Antoine, Adult Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1525-6853
C AlexandreHopital Europeen Georges Pompidou, Psychiatry, Paris, France.
F ThibautUniversity Hospital Cochin (site Tarnier), Paris University, AP-HP, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0204-5435

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Chemsex is defined by the use of psychoactive substances to facilitate or improve sexual relations. Our objectives were to assess the prevalence of the practice of 'chemsex' in a population of French university students and to identify socio-demographic and clinical factors associated with this practice. Material and methods: We have used an anonymous online questionnaire comprising 15 questions on socio-demographic characteristics, chemsex use, sexual satisfaction, the type of substances used in this sexual context and their route of administration. Results: A total of 680 people were included in our study. Among them, 22.5% reported chemsex behaviour in the past year. Using a multivariate analysis, factors associated with chemsex were dating application use ( Conclusion: This is the first study reporting a high prevalence of chemsex in a university student population. Further larger studies should be conducted to confirm these results showing a high prevalence of this at-risk behaviour.

Indexed as

Illicit DrugsPsychotropic DrugsSexual BehaviorSubstance-Related DisordersFranceHumansPrevalenceSexualityStudentsUniversitiesIllicit DrugsPsychotropic Drugsaddictionchemical sexChemsexparty and playsexualised drugsuniversity students

Identifiers

PMID35860173
PMCPMC9286745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.