ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2022
Evaluating patients' satisfaction level after using 3D printed PEEK facial implants in repairing maxillofacial deformities.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of implant materials for facial reconstructive and aesthetic surgery.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Polyetheretherketone for craniomaxillofacial defects: cases report, evaluation of patients' satisfaction and a systematic literature review.Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2025Article
- The impact of 3D printing in orthopedics and traumatology: Mapping the research landscape through bibliometrics and visualized analysis.Journal of orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Reconstruction with Polyetheretherketone Patient-Specific Implants: Aesthetic and Functional Outcomes.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Reconstruction of Nasal Deformity Resulting from Mucormycosis Using a Chin Silicone Implant.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
- Bone Regeneration and Polyetheretherketone Implants in Maxillo-Facial Surgery and Neurosurgery: A Multidisciplinary Study.Biology · 2024Article
- Interdisciplinary innovative approach to an aggressive ossifying fibroma case: Integrating 3D surgery and customized reconstruction in maxillofacial and dental care.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2024Article
- Endoscopic-Assisted Forehead Augmentation with Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Patient-Specific Implant (PSI) for Aesthetic Considerations.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: it is generally the case in any traumatic accident where a loss in hard tissue occurs to preform restorative plastic surgery, as there are many materials and approaches used to restore the loss, this research sheds the light on the use of one such material and approach being 3D printed facial implants manufactured from PolyEther Ether Ketone (PEEK) and to evaluate the level of patients' satisfaction following the use of said method in repairing maxillofacial deformities. Materials and methods: a research sample consisting of 10 patients with facial deformities underwent maxillofacial reconstructive surgery between 2020 and 2021 in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery in the Tishreen University Hospital - Latakia - Syria. All patients underwent Computed Tomography (CT) scans, then the design of the required facial implant was carried out, the final form of the facial implant was printed from PolyEther Ether Ketone (PEEK), and then surgical work was performed, a check-up after 3 months of the surgical procedure was carried out to evaluate the level of satisfaction on a scale of 1-5. Results: The results from the 10 patients showed a good level of satisfaction except in one case where the facial implant had to be removed due to recurrent infection where the patient showed no signs of response to medicinal treatment following the surgery. Conclusions: this research suggests that the use of 3D printed PEEK facial implants to be very agreeable in terms of functionality and aesthetics in treating various facial deformities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.