Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35860110›Full record

ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2022

Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for the management of perioperative hypothermia: Systematic review, critical appraisal, and quality assessment with the AGREE II instrument.

Mohamed Ali Babiker Mohamed, Wael Ahmed Abdelwahab Abdelkarim, Mohamed Abdulmonem Salih Aabdeen, Tarig Hassan Elobid Ahmed, Hassan H H Sarsour, Ahmed M El-Malky, Yasser S Amer, Nuha Alsaleh, Rakan I Nazer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mohamed Ali Babiker MohamedLeeds University Teaching Hospital, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Wael Ahmed Abdelwahab AbdelkarimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamed Abdulmonem Salih AabdeenPaediatric Surgery Department, Paediatric Urology Division, Leeds University Teaching Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Tarig Hassan Elobid AhmedTrauma and Orthopaedic Department, Manchester Royal Infirmary Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Hassan H H SarsourNutrition Officer at Mercy Corps Europe, Kadugli, Sudan.
Ahmed M El-MalkyPublic Health and Community Medicine Department, Theodor Bilharz Research Institute, Academy of Scientific Research, Ministry of Higher Education, Cairo, Egypt.
Yasser S AmerPediatrics Department, King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Nuha AlsalehDepartment of Surgery, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia.
Rakan I NazerCardiac Science Department, King Fahad Cardiac Science Center, College of Medicine, King Saud University, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inadvertent perioperative hypothermia is considered an emergency life-threatening situation. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) on how to manage hypothermia, based on evidence and expert opinions, could save lives. This systematic review assessed and compared the most recently approved international CPGs with the AGREE II instrument. We searched international bibliographic databases to identify relevant guidelines for managing perioperative hypothermia. Four independent reviewers (consultant anesthesiologists) critically appraised the selected guidelines with the AGREE II instrument. We analyzed inter-rater agreement and calculated an intra-class correlation coefficient (Kappa). We identified five CPGs for perioperative hypothermia that were eligible for critical appraisal. These CPGs were issued by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE-2016); the American Society of Peri-Anesthesia Nurses/Agency for Health Care Research and Quality (ASPAN/AHRQ-2006); the University of Southern Mississippi (USM/CPG-2017); The University Assistance Complex of Salamanca (UACS/CPG-2018); and the Justus-Liebig University of Giessen (UKGM/CPG-2015). The overall assessments of NICE-2016 and ASPAN/AHRQ-2006 scored >80%. These results were consistent with high scores achieved in the six domains of AGREE II: (1) scope and purpose, (2) stakeholder involvement, (3) rigor of development, (4) clarity of presentation, (5) applicability, and (6) editorial independence domains. The NICE-2016, ASPAN/AHRQ-2006, and USM/CPG-2017) scored, respectively, 94%, 81%, and 70% for domain 3, 91%, 87%, and 66% for domain 5, and 90%, 82%, and 77% for domain 6. Generally, the NICE CPGs received significantly better clinical recommendations. However, all five evidence-based CPGs were of high methodological quality and were recommended for use in practice. Saudi Arabia should formulate its own national CPGs for diagnosis and management of perioperative hypothermia and to be published on NICE.

Indexed as

AGREE II instrumentCritical appraisalPerioperative hypothermiaPractice guidelinesQuality assessment

Identifiers

PMID35860110
PMCPMC9289222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.