Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35860097›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2022

Forgotten guidewire: A case report.

Paulo Inácio Alves Ramos Diniz, Juan Eduardo Rios Rodriguez, João Pedro Salgado Pio Oliveira, Mirella Cruz Lira, Renan Danilo Lima da Rocha, Priscilla Ribeiro Dos Santos Campelo, Juliana da Costa Matos, Leonardo Pessoa Cavalcante

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paulo Inácio Alves Ramos DinizFederal University of Amazonas, Getúlio Vargas University Hospital, Vascular Surgery Division. Manaus-AM, Brazil.
Juan Eduardo Rios RodriguezFederal University of Amazonas, Getúlio Vargas University Hospital, General Surgery Division. Manaus-AM, Brazil.
João Pedro Salgado Pio OliveiraFederal University of Amazonas, Medical School. Manaus-AM, Brazil.
Mirella Cruz LiraFederal University of Amazonas, Medical School. Manaus-AM, Brazil.
Renan Danilo Lima da RochaFederal University of Amazonas, Getúlio Vargas University Hospital, Vascular Surgery Division. Manaus-AM, Brazil.
Priscilla Ribeiro Dos Santos CampeloFederal University of Amazonas, Getúlio Vargas University Hospital, Vascular Surgery Division. Manaus-AM, Brazil.
Juliana da Costa MatosAmazonas State University, Internal Medicine Department, Nephrology Discipline. Manaus-AM, Brazil.
Leonardo Pessoa CavalcanteFederal University of Amazonas, Getúlio Vargas University Hospital, Vascular Surgery Division. Manaus-AM, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Amazonas · BRHospital do Coração · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The Seldinger technique for implanting central venous catheters is the most used in the world. A metallic guidewire is employed in it, introduced through the lumen of a venipuncture needle, which serves as a path for the introduction of the central venous catheter. Complications directly related to this technique are of several types, such an insertion of a long-winded segment of the guidewire, which can lead to venous perforation, cardiac perforation, arrhythmias or even guidewire retention/embolization. Presentation of the case: We report the case of a patient with a late diagnosis of a guidewire retained in her venous system. The distal end of the guidewire pierced the pulmonary artery, crossed the chest wall and remained in the left breast tissue. It was removed by laparotomy, through an extra-peritoneal access to the right common iliac vein. Discussion: Different factors have been identified as responsible for the increase in the number of guidewires retained after central venous catheterizations. Lack of supervision, in procedures performed by training physicians, has been identified as one of the most important risk factor in the cases reported in the literature. Conclusion: The present report demonstrates that central venous catheterization, despite being a relatively straight forward procedure, should not be underestimated and should be performed by properly trained physicians or by training physicians under supervision.

Indexed as

Case reportsVascular access devicesVascular surgical proceduresVascular system injuries

Identifiers

PMID35860097
PMCPMC9289250
OpenAlexW4281803806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.