ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2022
Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in immune thrombocytopenia patients treated with thrombopoietin receptor agonist: Case reports and literature review.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Evaluation of quality of life and recurrence rate after intraperitoneal onlay mesh laparoscopic repair of ventral hernia with or without closure of the defect (pIPOM vs. sIPOM).Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- A Case of Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis Following Eltrombopag in Immune Thrombocytopenia.Cureus · 2025Article
- Eltrombopag-Induced Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: A Case Report and Literature Review.Case reports in hematology · 2025Article
- Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in patient of immune thrombocytopenic purpura managed with mechanical thrombectomy: An anecdotal endovascular experience from lower middle income country.Clinical case reports · 2024Article
- Association of thrombopoietin-related drugs with thromboembolic events: Mendelian randomization and a real-world study.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2024Article
- Safety of non‑peptide thrombopoietin receptor agonists in patients with immune thrombocytopenia: A systematic review and meta‑analysis of short‑term double‑blind randomized clinical trials.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2023Article
- Long term use of eltrombopag in children with chronic immune thrombocytopenia: extended real life retrospective multicenter experience of the Italian Association of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and importance: Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis is an uncommon adverse event in immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) patients treated with thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs). Case presentation: We reported two cases of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis after eltrombopag administration. The first case is a 29-year-old ITP woman who recently initiated eltrombopag one month before admission. She presented with progressive headache, visual disturbance, and nausea for six days with unremarkable physical examination except for bilateral optic disc edema. She was treated with enoxaparin and switched to edoxaban when discharged. The second case is a 75-year-old man with a history of vaccine-induced ITP. He was initially treated with dexamethasone and eltrombopag. One month later, he developed acute cerebral venous thrombosis with hemorrhagic infarction in the bilateral frontal lobes. Even though he was treated with intravenous heparin, his status was not improved. He received the best supportive care. Discussion: The pathophysiology of TPO-RAs-associated cerebral venous sinus thrombosis remained unclear but might associate with platelet activation. Most cases of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis occur within two months, thus closed platelet monitoring is important. Conclusion: Careful use and closed monitoring might prevent this event. Indications of initiation and tapering must be considered before TPO-RAs administration. Off-label use may enhance TPO-RA side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.